Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use cmake #47

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 24, 2020
Merged

Use cmake #47

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 24, 2020

Conversation

wolfv
Copy link
Member

@wolfv wolfv commented Feb 24, 2020

Hi @xhochy

For the time being I have also removed the static library build. Not sure if that is going to break everything :) do we need the static lib?

For me the main reason to do this is that CMake installs the files necessary to find_package protobuf from other projects.

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@jjhelmus
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Removing the static library should be fine. If downstream packages require it, it can be added back.

@jjhelmus jjhelmus merged commit 4af6d15 into conda-forge:master Feb 24, 2020
@jjhelmus
Copy link
Contributor

The switch to cmake resulted in different dynamic libraries being created, see #48. I've moved the new packages to broken until this can be resolved.

@sodre
Copy link
Member

sodre commented Apr 13, 2020

Also, please keep the static library. I need it for linking against a go module.

@xhochy
Copy link
Member

xhochy commented Apr 13, 2020

Also, please keep the static library. I need it for linking against a go module.

Would it be OK to have it in a separate libprotobuf-static?

This was referenced May 15, 2020
jjhelmus added a commit to jjhelmus/libprotobuf-feedstock that referenced this pull request May 22, 2020
This reverts commit 4af6d15, reversing
changes made to 821daf4.
jjhelmus added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2020
@isuruf isuruf mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants