Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Satisfy both conda-forge and defaults channel requirements #18

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

183amir
Copy link

@183amir 183amir commented Jun 7, 2016

This pull allows me to install opencv alongside anaconda=4 while also allowing other versions for conda-forge channel consistency.

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe:

  • Failed to even lint the recipe (might be a conda-smithy bug) 😢

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Let's hold on this for a bit. I'm trying to see if we can get a bit more inline with defaults by downgrading some of these packages. We already have some problems like qt dependency compatibility issues, which we somehow need to address.

@183amir
Copy link
Author

183amir commented Jun 7, 2016

This is not going to break anything, it will just add more flexibility.

@183amir
Copy link
Author

183amir commented Jun 7, 2016

The Linux build is broken because of loose dependency tracking of jpeg in jasper:

jasper 1.900.1 0 linux-64          : jpeg
jasper 1.900.1 1 linux-64          : jpeg
jasper 1.900.1 2 linux-64          : jpeg 9b

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

It will eat up a bunch of build time though. If you try to add this to OpenCV 3.x, it won't work as we are already near the limit with CircleCI. Again let's please hold on this and figure out what we can do with these image libraries so we are not so out of sync with defaults.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants