-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add VS2022 17.6 #64
Add VS2022 17.6 #64
Conversation
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( I do have some suggestions for making it better though... For recipe:
|
@conda-forge-admin, please rerender |
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.06.16.09.26.13
Aside from smithy mis-rendering this recipe (I fixed it manually), it looks like MSFT changed the extension for some of the libraries from
Would you like to just adapt the tests to reflect that, or rename them back to |
Why do you think changing the DLL name to |
Work in what way? Pass the tests here? That should be tautological if we adapt them to reflect the renaming. Work more broadly? I guess it's up to Microsoft to ensure that, as they renamed the extensions. |
Yes
No, they renamed the intermediate artifact in the executable. That does not mean that the file ends up as Changing the name of a DLL is equivalent to changing the name of the shared object |
OK, I had not gotten that deep or far, but that makes sense! So we don't have a choice about renaming those libs in any case. |
I added a minimal fix to ensure the intermediate DLLs get properly renamed and tests are passing again. PTAL :) |
@conda-forge-admin, rerender |
I don't know why, but the rerendering is broken here - it does not zip the values correctly. Also, shouldn't we be able to drop some of the older builds? IIUC, it's only going to work with the latest cl_version (per series) that's present in the image? |
Thanks. Yes, we can drop some of the older builds. |
|
Recently released...
I'm pretty sure we need this because the windows images have been updated, and we're getting lots of
AFAICT this has broken VS2022 in a few places, but since that's not our default the blast radius is not so big.
Xref discussion in #57, where the conclusion was that we need to match the cl_version with what's in the image.
Closes #63