-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 785
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev/tsweeney/b1.15.1 #2495
Dev/tsweeney/b1.15.1 #2495
Conversation
Per https://docs.docker.com/storage/bind-mounts/#configure-mount-consistency-for-macos this is just another way to specify the already ignored "cached" and "delegated" mount options. Signed-off-by: Marius Hoch <hoch.m00@gmail.com>
Apparently docker supports this as well, see https://docs.docker.com/storage/volumes/#use-a-read-only-volume Signed-off-by: Marius Hoch <hoch.m00@gmail.com>
Validate is not happy. |
@rhatdan I see everything in yellow here. Where are you seeing an error? But then again, I'm not sure why it's yellow 12+ hours later.... |
OK, git weirdness, despite having refreshed my web interface, no change to the build status on the GitHub page. I did the last reply and now I'm seeing the red. I love computers.... |
As the title says. Signed-off-by: TomSweeneyRedHat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
3c31664
to
24c307c
Compare
if setgroups is blocked to set up the user namespace, do not attempt to use it to clear the additional groups. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
some file systems under /sys might not be accessible to an unprivileged user. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
OK, now they're all there. I'm not sure why they didn't pull with the mass cherry-pick that I did to start. Fingers crossed for the testing. |
@nalind @rhatdan Gating is falling down with the below, but I don't think this commit is part of this PR, and if it is, I'm not sure what magic git commands I'd need to fix it? I just checked my command history, I did a
|
The validation test that runs as part of the gating job looks like it's picking a common ancestor commit from master as the baseline. Going by |
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
vendor golang.org/x/text@v0.3.3 | ||
Cirrus: Fix missing htpasswd in registry img | ||
Switch scripts to use containers.conf | ||
Merge pull request #2471 from vrothberg/1.15-update-x/text |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the merge commit log for line 12. We don't need to mention it.
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
Switch scripts to use containers.conf | ||
Merge pull request #2471 from vrothberg/1.15-update-x/text | ||
Make imagebuildah.BuildOptions.Architecture/OS optional | ||
Merge pull request #2483 from nalind/release-1.15-arch |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the merge commit log for the previous line. We don't need to mention it.
4e42b4a
to
2fd3fc9
Compare
@nalind, thx very much for the cirrus pointer. I've touched that up and have removed the commit titles as you requested from the changelogs and buidlah.spec. |
Unfortunately still the same DCO issue for that commit.... |
Based on the test log's |
This is required so that the mount point shows up when buildah is vendored into Podman. Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: TomSweeneyRedHat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
2fd3fc9
to
cd67d69
Compare
thx again @nalind, tweaked and repushed. I also added a comment in the git-validation.sh file explaining where the id there is getting pulled from. |
LGTM |
The branch's |
One of the CI scripts creates that link for this purpose. I think if there was some other primary-failure, failing to upload could be an expected secondary failure. I would just ignore it unless it persists beyond the primary (build) failure. |
Ah, the binaries are written to the |
I pushed the retest button a couple of times, yes. |
Ah, mystery solved, thanks @nalind. |
bors r+ |
2495: Dev/tsweeney/b1.15.1 r=rhatdan a=TomSweeneyRedHat As the title says! This was my first big cherry-pick and kit build on a release branch. I'd problems with the cherry-pick, it didn't like one of the buildahimage/Containerfiles, so hopefully I didn't mess it up much. Co-authored-by: Marius Hoch <hoo@online.de> Co-authored-by: Zvi "CtrlZvi" Effron <viz_skywalker+GitHub@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
If this is a script rather than something Cirrus does because we set |
Build failed:
|
bors retry |
2495: Dev/tsweeney/b1.15.1 r=rhatdan a=TomSweeneyRedHat As the title says! This was my first big cherry-pick and kit build on a release branch. I'd problems with the cherry-pick, it didn't like one of the buildahimage/Containerfiles, so hopefully I didn't mess it up much. Co-authored-by: Marius Hoch <hoo@online.de> Co-authored-by: Zvi "CtrlZvi" Effron <viz_skywalker+GitHub@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Build failed:
|
bors retry |
Build succeeded: |
Oh! Hmm, it was right around here https://github.com/containers/buildah/blob/master/contrib/cirrus/build.sh#L22 but it's gone now 😕 I swore I...oh, here's what I was thinking of: 90868620d#diff-43090a914b41249c6581b485cd9a4e06R22-R25 Does that help? |
I guess we removed when we started putting the binaries there in #2380? I don't know enough about the packaging system to know whether it was a requirement for making it work or if it was just a stylistic change that happened at the same time. |
As the title says!
This was my first big cherry-pick and kit build on a release branch. I'd problems with the cherry-pick, it didn't like one of the buildahimage/Containerfiles, so hopefully I didn't mess it up much.