Shared volumes, like in Kubernetes Pod

[PavelSosin-320]

Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST? (leave only one on its own line)

/kind feature
or only Idea
Description
Enable to create shared volumes at the Pod level like in the Kubernetes Pod

Currently, Podman volumes can be shared via podman run --mounts-from, i.e only at the container level. On other hand, Kubernetes allows share volumes uniformly mounted by all Pod's containers. I would prefer to mount Podman volumes at the Pod level using
either podman volume create --pod mount-point.
or podman volume create & podman pod create --volume volume:mount-point --volume,..
what is easy for implementation.
Steps to reproduce the issue:

Describe the results you received:

Describe the results you expected:

Additional information you deem important (e.g. issue happens only occasionally):

Output of podman version:

(paste your output here)

Output of podman info --debug:

(paste your output here)

Package info (e.g. output of rpm -q podman or apt list podman):

(paste your output here)

Have you tested with the latest version of Podman and have you checked the Podman Troubleshooting Guide? (https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/master/troubleshooting.md)

Yes/No

Additional environment details (AWS, VirtualBox, physical, etc.):

[rhatdan]

Seems reasonable, interested in opening a PR?
@haircommander @umohnani8 WDYT?

[haircommander]

yes this makes sense to me! moves podman pods more towards a pod as a logical host

[github-actions]

A friendly reminder that this issue had no activity for 30 days.

[rhatdan]

@cdoern At some point might want to look at this.

[cdoern]

@rhatdan yeah this looks cool! also want to give that buildah issue a try since I haven't worked on anything there yet,

[github-actions]

A friendly reminder that this issue had no activity for 30 days.

[cdoern]

working on this, contingent on #10933 which is the infra container rework

[github-actions]

A friendly reminder that this issue had no activity for 30 days.

[rhatdan]

@cdoern any update on this issue?

[cdoern]

yep @rhatdan this is what #11409 deals with. Should be merged soon