Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix rootless networking with userns and ports #12227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2021

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Nov 8, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:

A rootless container created with a custom userns and forwarded ports
did not work. I refactored the network setup to make the setup logic
more clear.

How to verify it

  1. terminal
    podman run -it --rm --userns keep-id --network bridge -p 8080:8080 alpine nc -l -p 8080
  2. terminal
    echo test | nc 127.0.0.1 8080

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 8, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 8, 2021
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ func (c *Container) handleRestartPolicy(ctx context.Context) (_ bool, retErr err

// setup slirp4netns again because slirp4netns will die when conmon exits
if c.config.NetMode.IsSlirp4netns() {
err := c.runtime.setupSlirp4netns(c)
err := c.runtime.setupSlirp4netns(c, c.state.NetNS)
if err != nil {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason 293 and 294 are separate lines?

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Nov 8, 2021

LGTM overall

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

looks like some test unhappiness @Luap99

A rootless container created with a custom userns and forwarded ports
did not work. I refactored the network setup to make the setup logic
more clear.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 9, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 9, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5437568 into containers:main Nov 9, 2021
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the net-setup branch November 9, 2021 21:31
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants