make hack/markdown-preprocess parallel-safe #17331
Conversation
One of the tmpfiles was not uniquely named, resulting in conflicts with parallel 'make docs'. Fix that. A better solution would be to run only one instance of the preprocess script, but the Makefile incantation for that is beyond me. This approach is CPU-wasteful but good enough. Fixes: containers#17322 Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
openshift-ci
bot
added
release-note
approved
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, vrothberg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL |
|
/cherry-pick v4.4 |
|
@vrothberg: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of v4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
@vrothberg: new pull request created: #17360 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
locked - please file new issue/PR
One of the tmpfiles was not uniquely named, resulting in
conflicts with parallel 'make docs'. Fix that.
A better solution would be to run only one instance of the
preprocess script, but the Makefile incantation for that
is beyond me. This approach is CPU-wasteful but good enough.
Fixes: #17322
Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago santiago@redhat.com