-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
vendor latest c/common #20446
vendor latest c/common #20446
Conversation
includes tag/untag changes Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Seems like I created #20447 at the very same time (minus the test/apiv2 change) :)
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
on centos 8 and 9 |
Google's infrastructure in south east US is down ... |
Restarted in hope the infra is back |
@vrothberg Is it expected the the URL starts with |
Yes, that is the "string within transport". Apologies for not making sure it's passing the test. Could you update the test to buy us some time? |
Yes I am fine with updating the tests the reason I am asking is because the string makes no sense to me. IMO it must either be just |
Tag now does a prepend internally instead of append with the names. Thus the order changed which needs some test changes. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc, Luap99, vrothberg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?