-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
README: update "out of scope" section #2428
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -31,10 +31,15 @@ This project tests all builds against each supported version of Fedora, the late | |
|
||
## Out of scope | ||
|
||
* Signing and pushing images to various image storages. | ||
See [Skopeo](https://github.com/containers/skopeo/). | ||
* Container Runtimes daemons for working with the Kubernetes CRI interface. | ||
See [CRI-O](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cri-o). | ||
* Specializing in signing and pushing images to various storage backends. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I like how you handled this @vrothberg |
||
See [Skopeo](https://github.com/containers/skopeo/) for those tasks. | ||
* Container runtimes daemons for working with the Kubernetes CRI interface. | ||
[CRI-O](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cri-o) specializes in that. | ||
* Supporting `docker-compose`. We believe that Kubernetes is the defacto | ||
standard for container orchestration. Hence, Podman allows the creation of | ||
Pods from a Kubernetes YAML file. See | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This doesn't make sense as a term for Making someone deploy Kubernetes for that is madness. However, it is nice that podman can generate Kubernetes YAML for translation to a Kubernetes system, it makes no sense to not have the facility built in so that people can develop these things to eventually host in an OpenShift/Kubernetes system. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. docker compose is not part of Docker it is a separate project. And it is Huge. So we currently do not have the man power to do everything that is involved in doing this. If someone wants to start a project called podman-compose, then we would support them. We don't want to force anyone to do kubernetes. We are just suggesting alternatives and looking at the problem from a different point of view. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right. You can use
I suggest cooling down a bit. Noone is forcing users into Kubernetes. You were referring to However, the text must be corrected as it was meant to refer to podman-play-kube. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, it's fine in this regard: "Hence, Podman allows the creation of Pods from a Kubernetes YAML file." Not sure if we should avoid mentioning "orchestrating" and rephrase it. |
||
[podman-play-kube](https://github.com/containers/libpod/blob/master/docs/podman-play-kube.1.md) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Link generate too There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Are you going to add generate too per @mheon's suggestion? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorry, the PR is in already. Shall I update? I think that the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sure open a new PR. |
||
for more details. | ||
|
||
## OCI Projects Plans | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we leave this, with a note that Podman does it, but we still recommend Skopeo for serious work? Our sign/verify code isn't as mature as theirs