Skip to content

Conversation

@medsouz
Copy link
Contributor

@medsouz medsouz commented Sep 20, 2025

To help maintain the sanity of whoever has to review this PR I've limited my changes to only change argument names violating this linter to _. There seems to be a few spots that could be cleaned up further but that feels out of scope for a change this large.

Resolves #27111

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@github-actions github-actions bot added machine kind/api-change Change to remote API; merits scrutiny labels Sep 20, 2025
@medsouz
Copy link
Contributor Author

medsouz commented Sep 20, 2025

Looks like there are still some changes needed to environments other than Linux. Once CI is complete I'll address these.

@packit-as-a-service
Copy link

[NON-BLOCKING] Packit jobs failed. @containers/packit-build please check. Everyone else, feel free to ignore.

@medsouz medsouz marked this pull request as draft September 20, 2025 02:50
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 20, 2025
@medsouz medsouz marked this pull request as ready for review September 20, 2025 03:33
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 20, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Honny1 Honny1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM. Just one small request: could you please squash all your commits into one?

CI fails are flakes.

Copy link
Member

@Honny1 Honny1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM.

/LGTM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 29, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 30, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you LGTM, looks like it needs a rebase though

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 30, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 30, 2025
@medsouz
Copy link
Contributor Author

medsouz commented Sep 30, 2025

Should be good for review now. Thanks for taking a look at this

@medsouz medsouz requested review from Honny1 and Luap99 September 30, 2025 14:22
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 30, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Honny1 Honny1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM

To get this merged, please retrigger the CI. The test looks like it's flaking—otherwise LGTM.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Honny1, Luap99, medsouz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Oct 1, 2025

@medsouz looks like there is yet another merge conflict so you have to rebase again.

I try to to get this merged quickly once you push again so you hopefully don't have to deal with that again, sorry about that.

Signed-off-by: Matt Souza <medsouz99@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 1, 2025
@medsouz
Copy link
Contributor Author

medsouz commented Oct 1, 2025

No worries @Luap99, merging something that touches this many files is always a pain. 😆

Should be good to go now but I'll keep an eye on CI and any future merges to main today to keep it in a ready state.

@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Oct 1, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 1, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d0212f9 into containers:main Oct 1, 2025
87 of 89 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/api-change Change to remote API; merits scrutiny lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. machine release-note-none

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

lint: enable revive unused-parameter check

4 participants