test: Wait for killed container to avoid leak

[ricardobranco777]

Wait for killed container ignoring exit status to avoid leak.

We see this sporadic failure a lot in the rootless/remote scenario:

https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/5359148/file/podman-bats-user-remote.tap.txt

#not ok 302 [130] podman kill - print IDs or raw input # in 864 ms
# (from function `basic_teardown' in file test/system/helpers.bash, line 255,
#  from function `teardown' in test file test/system/helpers.bash, line 265)
#   `basic_teardown' failed
# 
# [23:46:42.104180370] $ /usr/bin/podman-remote run --rm -d quay.io/libpod/testimage:20241011 top
# [23:46:42.272297627] 547df43df0e9ce0132e19f3073a6268e4734132b3c742ef66cec9ce8519a4fb5
# 
# [23:46:42.278042528] $ /usr/bin/podman-remote kill -a
# [23:46:42.351655661] 547df43df0e9ce0132e19f3073a6268e4734132b3c742ef66cec9ce8519a4fb5
# 
# [23:46:42.371353512] $ /usr/bin/podman-remote run --rm -d --name c-t302-pmmcj57o quay.io/libpod/testimage:20241011 top
# [23:46:42.533612827] def040d84cb3a752616e01d72c7dbf358623f65241ce7221218f21685a584fdc
# 
# [23:46:42.538995022] $ /usr/bin/podman-remote kill c-t302-pmmcj57o
# [23:46:42.618828613] c-t302-pmmcj57o
# # [teardown]
# vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
# *** Leaked container: def040d84cb3 quay.io/libpod/testimage:20241011 c-t302-pmmcj57o  Removing

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

[Honny1]

Thanks, LGTM

The failed CI test looks like a flake. Please retrigger it here: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6278296695996416. As the PR author, you have permission to do so.

/LGTM

[baude]

LGTM
/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude, ricardobranco777

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [baude]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment