Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

system df: fix image-size calculations #7604

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2020

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Fix the image-size calculations of system-df, where the shared size is
the actual shared size with other images (including children) and the
(total) size is the sum of the shared and unique size [1].

To calculate parent/child relations, make use of the recently added
layer tree which allows for quick (and cached!) calculations.

Break calculating image disk usages into the image runtime to a) access
the layer tree, and b) make the code easier to maintain and extend.

[1] https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/system_df/

Fixes: #7406
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg rothberg@redhat.com

Fix the image-size calculations of system-df, where the shared size is
the actual shared size with other images (including children) and the
(total) size is the sum of the shared and unique size [1].

To calculate parent/child relations, make use of the recently added
layer tree which allows for quick (and cached!) calculations.

Break calculating image disk usages into the image runtime to a) access
the layer tree, and b) make the code easier to maintain and extend.

[1] https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/system_df/

Fixes: containers#7406
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <rothberg@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 11, 2020
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@rhatdan PTAL

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 11, 2020

Awesome work @vrothberg
LGTM
@mheon @TomSweeneyRedHat @ashley-cui @QiWang19 @jwhonce @baude PTAL

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 11, 2020

LGTM, but tests are going red

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 11, 2020

May have just been a flake, restarting

stat.SharedSize = *size
}

stat.Size = stat.SharedSize + stat.UniqueSize
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

stat.Size can directly set to size after L99

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but this follows the definition in the documentation

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for checking! Yes, I wanted to make it more obvious that Size is the sum of the other two.

@QiWang19
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 11, 2020

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 11, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 11, 2020
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 11, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7178776 into containers:master Sep 11, 2020
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the fix-7406 branch September 11, 2020 15:46
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

'podman system df' is slow
6 participants