Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change source path resolution for volume copy-up #9415

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2021

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Feb 17, 2021

Instead of using the container's mountpoint as the base of the chroot and indexing from there by the volume directory, instead use the full path of what we want to copy as the base of the chroot and copy everything in it. This resolves the bug, ends up being a bit simpler code-wise (no string concatenation, as we already have the full path calculated for other checks), and seems more understandable than trying to resolve things on the destination side of the copy-up.

Fixes #9354

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 17, 2021
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Feb 17, 2021

Still need to write a test for this one - need to get a minimal image that reproduces.

@nalind @vrothberg PTAL
@afbjorklund FYI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 17, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 17, 2021
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Feb 17, 2021

Test added, should be ready now.

Instead of using the container's mountpoint as the base of the
chroot and indexing from there by the volume directory, instead
use the full path of what we want to copy as the base of the
chroot and copy everything in it. This resolves the bug, ends up
being a bit simpler code-wise (no string concatenation, as we
already have the full path calculated for other checks), and
seems more understandable than trying to resolve things on the
destination side of the copy-up.

Fixes containers#9354

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <matthew.heon@pm.me>
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Feb 17, 2021

Re-running one flake, rest seems good. @containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

F32-rootless test is failing, I'm not sure if that's a theme today or not.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [mheon,saschagrunert]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 18, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c3419d2 into containers:master Feb 18, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Volume mounting changed in podman 3.0.0
6 participants