Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add code to MR for tcp_max_syn_backlog test #499

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024
Merged

Add code to MR for tcp_max_syn_backlog test #499

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

nsednev
Copy link
Collaborator

@nsednev nsednev commented Aug 8, 2024

Title: Validate if tcp_max_syn_backlog network parameter on Host can be resilient against random changes of this parameter in QM.

Description: The purpose of this test script is to validate if tcp_max_syn_backlog parameter value on Host, can be resilient against random changes of this parameter in QM. This is validated by creating a test environment, that generates and sets a random tcp_max_syn_backlog value in range from 128 to 1024 in QM and as soon as QM gets a new value, the test verifies that tcp_max_syn_backlog parameter on Host stays the same and not changes because of the QM network changes.

Expected result: PASS: tcp_max_syn_backlog parameter's value on Host stays the same.

Jira: VROOM-19564

@dougsland
Copy link
Collaborator

looks like it reached the timeout limit (15m), we need to increase it.

Maximum test time '15m' exceeded.
Adjust the test 'duration' attribute if necessary.
https://tmt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/spec/tests.html#duration

@nsednev
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nsednev commented Aug 9, 2024

looks like it reached the timeout limit (15m), we need to increase it.

Maximum test time '15m' exceeded.
Adjust the test 'duration' attribute if necessary.
https://tmt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/spec/tests.html#duration

Changed to 20 mins and works fine now.
I'm not sure why that happened, might be the lab took more time Yesterday for some reason.

@dougsland
Copy link
Collaborator

dougsland commented Aug 9, 2024

It's Friday and almost end of the day for some countries in Europe, @dennisbrendel or @priyverm might have some ideas if he is around. Otherwise, I will try to look dig it later today. I think Yariv is already kind of busy travelling outside his country for the conference to review this one.

Signed-off-by: Nikolai Sednev <nsednev@redhat.com>
@nsednev
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nsednev commented Aug 9, 2024

It's Friday and almost end of the day for some countries in Europe, @dennisbrendel or @priyverm might have some ideas if he is around. Otherwise, I will try to look dig it later today. I think Yariv is already kind of busy travelling outside his country for the conference to review this one.

Yes, its a holiday in here Today, I'm just trying to cover what I can till the next week.
Really no need to hurry, we can push it next week.

@dougsland dougsland merged commit 0f3e0cc into containers:main Aug 9, 2024
8 checks passed
@nsednev nsednev deleted the VROOM-19564 branch August 11, 2024 10:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants