[release-1.13] Bump c/common to v0.55.3, skopeo to 1.13.2 and 1.13.3-dev

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

Readying for final release for RHEL 8.9/9.3. Bumping c/common to v0.55.3 and Skopeo to 1.13.2, then 1.13.3-dev

[TomSweeneyRedHat]

@lsm5 all the pack-it-as-a-service tests are failing here in this Skopeo branch. Is that expected?

[mtrmac]

I’ll defer to @lsm5 .

---

At a very quick glance, some of them seem to be distribution repo problems (missing keys / incorrectly signed packages);

https://dashboard.packit.dev/results/copr-builds/929117 might be a real failure, maybe we need to backport #2059 .

[mtrmac]

Go changes in this PR LGTM.

[lsm5]

• Rawhide has been failing because of some dnf / gpg issues. It's been reported to the copr matrix room.
• ELN failure also I've seen before, it's probably because of the recent branching of f39 from rawhide.
• centos-stream-9 is failing because of buildtag issue. Looks like I haven't cherrypicked a packit commit to release-1.13. I'll look and update.

@mtrmac feel free to merge.

[mtrmac]

Thanks @lsm5 .

[lsm5]

https://dashboard.packit.dev/results/copr-builds/929117 might be a real failure, maybe we need to backport #2059 .

@mtrmac yes, that's the one. I'll backport it. @TomSweeneyRedHat please don't cut a new release until I do this backport.

[mtrmac]

@TomSweeneyRedHat https://github.com/containers/skopeo/releases/tag/v1.13.2 tagged.

[mtrmac]

@lsm5 Oops, I’m afraid I jumped the gun. Do we need to prepare a 1.13.3 with the backport, or is that relevant for upstream CI only?

[lsm5]

@lsm5 Oops, I’m afraid I jumped the gun. Do we need to prepare a 1.13.3 with the backport, or is that relevant for upstream CI only?

@mtrmac it's all good. Actually the backport was only needed for centos-9-stream, but I mistakenly asked to wait for the cherry-pick. My bad. Packit's fedora tasks are underway already.