Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use strings.Cut{,Prefix,Suffix} where appropriate #2100

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

kolyshkin
Copy link
Contributor

In some places, using strings.Cut (available since Go 1.18) instead of
strings.SplitN allows for simpler more readable code.

Similarly, using strings.CutPrefix and strings.CutSuffix (available since Go 1.20)
instead of their strings.Has* counterparts allows for simpler code.

Functions strings.CutPrefix and strings.CutSuffix are available
since Go 1.20 and can be used instead of strings.Has* counterparts
when the latter is followed by removing the prefix or suffix.

This simplifies the code a bit, allowing for less mistakes.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
In some places, using strings.Cut (available since Go 1.18) instead of
strings.SplitN allows for simpler more readable code.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
In some places, using strings.Cut (available since Go 1.18) instead of
strings.SplitN allows for simpler more readable code.

While at it, simplify UID/GID error message (as strconv.ParseUint error
already contains the source string).

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
In some places, using strings.Cut (available since Go 1.18) instead of
strings.SplitN allows for simpler more readable code.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
In some places, using strings.Cut (available since Go 1.18) instead of
strings.SplitN allows for simpler more readable code.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
In some places, using strings.Cut (available since Go 1.18) instead of
strings.SplitN allows for simpler more readable code.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
In some places, using strings.Cut (available since Go 1.18) instead of
strings.SplitN allows for simpler more readable code.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 20, 2024

/approve
LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 24, 2024

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 24, 2024

@mtrmac PTAL

Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, kolyshkin, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Collaborator

@mtrmac mtrmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Sep 24, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 205caa7 into containers:main Sep 24, 2024
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants