More robustly handle values passed to --distro and --release #977
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HarryMichal
added
3. Enhancement
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
...unless the selected distro matches the host system. containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
Having a list of supported distributions in the manual has been long overdue. Complementing it with the expected formats should make lives of users a bit easier. containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
…rors Using a non-supported distribution via `--distro` resulted in a silent fallback to the Fedora image which confuses users. When a faulty release format was used with `--release` a message without any hint about the correct format was shown to the user. This separates distro and release parsing into two chunks that have greater control over error reporting and provides more accurate error reports for the user. Fixes containers#937 containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
Found while working on containers#937 containers#977
HarryMichal
force-pushed
the
cmd/create/more-distro-release-hints
branch
from
f68d253 to
2ec7556
Compare
|
Build failed.
|
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
...unless the selected distro matches the host system. containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
Having a list of supported distributions in the manual has been long overdue. Complementing it with the expected formats should make lives of users a bit easier. containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
…rors Using a non-supported distribution via `--distro` resulted in a silent fallback to the Fedora image which confuses users. When a faulty release format was used with `--release` a message without any hint about the correct format was shown to the user. This separates distro and release parsing into two chunks that have greater control over error reporting and provides more accurate error reports for the user. Fixes containers#937 containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2022
Found while working on containers#937 containers#977
HarryMichal
force-pushed
the
cmd/create/more-distro-release-hints
branch
from
2ec7556 to
d13df7a
Compare
|
Build failed.
|
debarshiray
requested changes
Jan 11, 2022
debarshiray
reviewed
Jan 11, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This reminds me of commit fd756089efb89f05.
I have been having doubts about it, because splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions pushes the burden on the callers. The callers now need to carefully call the split functions in the right order, which opens the door for mistakes.
I think a good compromise would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API, but internally split it into smaller private functions. It would keep things simple for both the callers and the implementation.
Ultimately, the distro, release, image and container values are very tightly related here. So, we need a public API to which we feed the input values, and get back the resolved values, without worrying about the intricacies involved.
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
...unless the selected distro matches the host system. containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
Having a list of supported distributions in the manual has been long overdue. Complementing it with the expected formats should make lives of users a bit easier. containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
…rors Using a non-supported distribution via `--distro` resulted in a silent fallback to the Fedora image which confuses users. When a faulty release format was used with `--release` a message without any hint about the correct format was shown to the user. This separates distro and release parsing into two chunks that have greater control over error reporting and provides more accurate error reports for the user. Fixes containers#937 containers#977
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
HarryMichal
added a commit
to HarryMichal/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
Found while working on containers#937 containers#977
|
I merged the updates to the manuals in #986 after applying the above tweaks. |
Thanks! |
|
Build succeeded.
|
…rors Using a non-supported distribution via `--distro` resulted in a silent fallback to the Fedora image which confuses users. When a faulty release format was used with `--release` a message without any hint about the correct format was shown to the user. This separates distro and release parsing into two chunks that have greater control over error reporting and provides more accurate error reports for the user. Fixes containers#937 containers#977
Found while working on containers#937 containers#977
HarryMichal
force-pushed
the
cmd/create/more-distro-release-hints
branch
from
cf90340 to
1d641e3
Compare
|
Build failed.
|
HarryMichal
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2022
…rors Using a non-supported distribution via `--distro` resulted in a silent fallback to the Fedora image which confuses users. When a faulty release format was used with `--release` a message without any hint about the correct format was shown to the user. This separates distro and release parsing into two chunks that have greater control over error reporting and provides more accurate error reports for the user. Fixes #937 #977
HarryMichal
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2022
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions didn't turn out to be so useful [1]. It pushed the burden on the callers, who needed to carefully call the split functions in the right order, because the container, distro, image and release values are very tightly related. This opens the door for mistakes. A better approach would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API, but internally split it into smaller private functions, if necessary. It would keep things simple for both the callers and the implementation. Note that this commit doesn't include the private split, but leaves that as a future exercise. This reverts commit fd75608. [1] containers#977
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions didn't turn out to be so useful [1]. It pushed the burden on the callers, who needed to carefully call the split functions in the right order, because the container, distro, image and release values are very tightly related. This opens the door for mistakes. A better approach would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API, but internally split it into smaller private functions, if necessary. It would keep things simple for both the callers and the implementation. Note that this commit doesn't include the private split, but leaves that as a future exercise. This reverts commit fd75608. [1] containers#977
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. Splitting things even further might make it worse. A better approach might be to (re-)unify the code further. This is the first step towards that. This reverts the following commits: * 5c8ad7a * 02f45fd * 8b6418d ... but retains the test cases that were not tied to the changes in those commits. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. It pushed the burden on the callers, who needed to carefully call the split functions in the right order, because the container, distro, image and release values are very tightly related. This opens the door for mistakes. A better approach would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API. If necessary it could be internally split into smaller private functions. It would keep things simple for the callers. Note that this commit doesn't include the private split. If necessary, it can be done in future. This reverts commit fd75608. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. Splitting things even further might make it worse. A better approach might be to (re-)unify the code further. This is the first step towards that. This reverts the following commits: * 5c8ad7a * 02f45fd * 8b6418d ... but retains the test cases that were not tied to the changes in those commits. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. It pushed the burden on the callers, who needed to carefully call the split functions in the right order, because the container, distro, image and release values are very tightly related. This opens the door for mistakes. A better approach would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API. If necessary it could be internally split into smaller private functions. It would keep things simple for the callers. Note that this commit doesn't include the private split. If necessary, it can be done in future. This reverts commit fd75608. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. Splitting things even further might make it worse. A better approach might be to (re-)unify the code further. This is the first step towards that. This reverts the following commits: * 5c8ad7a * 02f45fd * 8b6418d ... but retains the test cases that were not tied to the changes in those commits. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. It pushed the burden on the callers, who needed to carefully call the split functions in the right order, because the container, distro, image and release values are very tightly related. This opens the door for mistakes. A better approach would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API. If necessary it could be internally split into smaller private functions. It would keep things simple for the callers. Note that this commit doesn't include the private split. If necessary, it can be done in future. This reverts commit fd75608. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. Splitting things even further might make it worse. A better approach might be to (re-)unify the code further. This is the first step towards that. This reverts the following commits: * 5c8ad7a * 02f45fd * 8b6418d ... but retains the test cases that were not tied to the changes in those commits. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. It pushed the burden on the callers, who needed to carefully call the split functions in the right order, because the container, distro, image and release values are very tightly related. This opens the door for mistakes. A better approach would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API. If necessary it could be internally split into smaller private functions. It would keep things simple for the callers. Note that this commit doesn't include the private split. If necessary, it can be done in future. This reverts commit fd75608. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. Splitting things even further might make it worse. A better approach might be to (re-)unify the code further. This is the first step towards that. This reverts the following commits: * 5c8ad7a * 02f45fd * 8b6418d ... but retains the test cases that were not tied to the changes in those commits. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. It pushed the burden on the callers, who needed to carefully call the split functions in the right order, because the container, distro, image and release values are very tightly related. This opens the door for mistakes. A better approach would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API. If necessary it could be internally split into smaller private functions. It would keep things simple for the callers. Note that this commit doesn't include the private split. If necessary, it can be done in future. This reverts commit fd75608. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937
debarshiray
reviewed
Sep 1, 2022
debarshiray
reviewed
Sep 1, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Time has only made me lean further towards my earlier comment. We should re-unify the resolution of container, distro, image and release, and not split it even further.
debarshiray
reviewed
Sep 1, 2022
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. Splitting things even further might make it worse. A better approach might be to (re-)unify the code further. This is the first step towards that. This reverts the following commits: * 5c8ad7a * 02f45fd * 8b6418d ... but retains the test cases that were not tied to the changes in those commits. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937 containers#1080
debarshiray
added a commit
to debarshiray/toolbox
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2022
The idea of splitting ResolveContainerAndImageNames into two public functions [1] didn't turn out to be so useful [2]. It pushed the burden on the callers, who needed to carefully call the split functions in the right order, because the container, distro, image and release values are very tightly related. This opens the door for mistakes. A better approach would be to restore ResolveContainerAndImageNames as the single public API. If necessary it could be internally split into smaller private functions. It would keep things simple for the callers. Note that this commit doesn't include the private split. If necessary, it can be done in future. This reverts commit fd75608. [1] Commit fd75608 containers#828 containers#838 [2] containers#977 containers#937 containers#1080
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change is rather big despite my efforts to keep it as small as possible. The handling needed some separation and along the way I noticed some possible problems or duplication.
Read commits for detailed information.
Fixes #937