Skip to content

Conversation

@zyn0217
Copy link

@zyn0217 zyn0217 commented Sep 12, 2025

We may substitute _Fn::template __f (a dependent template name) into a template-template parameter name, when building a parameter mapping.

They can't have the same NNSLoc, so the assertion doesn't hold.

Also we missed a case when profiling the concept, as in InjectedClassNameType.

We may substitute _Fn::template __f (a dependent template name) into
a template-template parameter name, when building a parameter mapping.

They can't have the same NNSLoc, so the assertion doesn't hold.

Also we missed a case when profiling the concept, as in
InjectedClassNameType.
@cor3ntin cor3ntin merged commit e0f26a8 into cor3ntin:corentin/use_normalization_for_satisfaction Sep 12, 2025
6 checks passed
cor3ntin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025
We may substitute _Fn::template __f (a dependent template name) into
a template-template parameter name, when building a parameter mapping.

They can't have the same NNSLoc, so the assertion doesn't hold.

Also we missed a case when profiling the concept, as in
InjectedClassNameType.
cor3ntin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
We may substitute _Fn::template __f (a dependent template name) into
a template-template parameter name, when building a parameter mapping.

They can't have the same NNSLoc, so the assertion doesn't hold.

Also we missed a case when profiling the concept, as in
InjectedClassNameType.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants