schema: remove invalid top-level keys #3891
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The "azurestack", "digitalocean", and "exoscale" keys are all image artifacts that go under the `images` key. So they shouldn't be listed as optional entries in the top-level dict. Remove those until we actually have support for uploading to those clouds (though e.g. azurestack is clearly one to which that will never apply). See also: coreos#3889
dustymabe
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2024
gursewak1997
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2024
|
/test rhcos |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "azurestack", "digitalocean", and "exoscale" keys are all image artifacts that go under the
imageskey. So they shouldn't be listed as optional entries in the top-level dict.Remove those until we actually have support for uploading to those clouds (though e.g. azurestack is clearly one to which that will never apply).
See also: #3889