Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix failure at second boot #2697

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: testing-devel
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hongxu-jia
Copy link

The issue occurs at unexpected shutdown (such as power-off, or ctrl + a +x to exit qemu) after first boot, data was not completely saved to disk.

Ignition has failed. Please ensure your config is valid. Note that only Ignition spec v3.0.0+ configs are accepted.

A CLI validation tool to check this called ignition-validate can be downloaded from GitHub:
https://github.com/coreos/ignition/releases

CoreOS uses boot args `ignition.firstboot' as flag for the first boot, during first boot, ignition parse and apply user define config (add user/passwd/ssh key), and remove the config file; then call script /usr/libexec/coreos-ignition-firstboot-complete.

In script /usr/libexec/coreos-ignition-firstboot-complete, it remove /boot/ignition.firstboot, the GRUB detect it and remove boot args `ignition.firstboot' if /boot/ignition.firstboot does not exists at second boot

If shundown at the time after ignition removes ignition user define config, before script /usr/libexec/coreos-ignition-firstboot-complete removes /boot/ignition.firstboot, the coming boot will be recognized as first boot, but the ignition user define config is lost

Call sync to assure the remove operation on disk

The issue occurs at unexpected shutdown (such as power-off, or ctrl + a
+x to exit qemu) after first boot, data was not completely saved to
disk.
------
Ignition has failed. Please ensure your config is valid. Note that only
Ignition spec v3.0.0+ configs are accepted.

A CLI validation tool to check this called ignition-validate can be
downloaded from GitHub:
    https://github.com/coreos/ignition/releases
------

CoreOS uses boot args `ignition.firstboot' as flag for the first boot,
during first boot, ignition parse and apply user define config (add
user/passwd/ssh key), and remove the config file; then call script
/usr/libexec/coreos-ignition-firstboot-complete.

In script /usr/libexec/coreos-ignition-firstboot-complete, it remove
/boot/ignition.firstboot, the GRUB detect it and remove boot args
`ignition.firstboot' if /boot/ignition.firstboot does not exists at
second boot

If shundown at the time after ignition removes ignition user define config,
before script /usr/libexec/coreos-ignition-firstboot-complete removes
/boot/ignition.firstboot, the coming boot will be recognized as first
boot, but the ignition user define config is lost

Call sync to assure the remove operation on disk

Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
Copy link
Member

@jlebon jlebon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I think this makes sense overall. But actually, I think previously we wanted to move that logic to the initramfs. I still think that makes sense so that we greatly reduce the race window. It could pretty easily live in coreos-boot-edit.service nowadays.

I'm not suggesting you do that in this PR though. The code move is trivial, but it needs to be fully thought through first.

@@ -17,3 +17,5 @@ rm /boot/ignition.firstboot
if [[ $(uname -m) = s390x ]]; then
/usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/50rdcore/rdcore zipl --boot-mount=/boot
fi

sync
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
sync
sync /boot

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also move this to right after the rm?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants