Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[next-devel] manifest: add fedora-candidate-compose to list of repos #2706

Conversation

dustymabe
Copy link
Member

@dustymabe dustymabe commented Nov 2, 2023

Late in the Fedora major release process adding this repo will
allow us to pull in candidate RPMs that are proposed to fix
release blocking or freeze exception issues. We will be able to
test out these proposed fixes sooner and also be more prepared
for releasing our final next release once the release is
deemed "Go".

See #2705

@dustymabe dustymabe changed the title manifest: add fedora-candidate-compose to list of repos [next-devel] manifest: add fedora-candidate-compose to list of repos Nov 2, 2023
@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Nov 2, 2023

Before we merge this, I think we clear up first whether the repo should always be in the manifest or only during a certain period. Maybe let's have a quick high-bandwidth chat about it.

Late in the Fedora major release process adding this repo will
allow us to pull in candidate RPMs that are proposed to fix
release blocking or freeze exception issues. We will be able to
test out these proposed fixes sooner and also be more prepared
for releasing our final `next` release once the release is
deemed "Go".

See coreos#2705
@dustymabe dustymabe force-pushed the dusty-next-devel-fedora-candidate-compose branch from 539d10f to b50f47b Compare November 2, 2023 18:51
@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

Updated the commit message here.

@dustymabe dustymabe marked this pull request as draft November 2, 2023 18:52
@dustymabe dustymabe marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2023 18:52
@dustymabe dustymabe enabled auto-merge (rebase) November 2, 2023 18:52
@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Nov 2, 2023

FTR: @dustymabe and I discussed this OOB and we agreed that outside of this time period (lead up to GA), we will go back to using the official Fedora repos only.

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

Since (as expected) this hasn't changed any packages in the compose:

[2023-11-02T18:58:59.953Z] Committing...done
[2023-11-02T18:59:38.568Z] 3216 metadata, 21061 content objects imported; 1.4?GB content written
[2023-11-02T18:59:38.568Z] fedora/x86_64/coreos/next-devel => 6e9069c3ebc2ca0f57e4e3e08615f0c007361927744b47a296f6189ddaad1053
[2023-11-02T18:59:38.568Z] ostree diff commit from: b38cd7b7bc28f0de91706280b201ea6c63986c7554922533ce3a7da36fb0f2d4
[2023-11-02T18:59:38.568Z] ostree diff commit to:   6e9069c3ebc2ca0f57e4e3e08615f0c007361927744b47a296f6189ddaad1053
[2023-11-02T18:59:38.568Z] 
[2023-11-02T18:59:38.568Z] New image input checksum: 8ca9162f649db809160315d86d21b64e7e67e52f0f7a74562036104831a34345

I'll go ahead and merge this. skipping the rest of CI

@dustymabe dustymabe merged commit 2a19b29 into coreos:next-devel Nov 2, 2023
2 of 3 checks passed
@dustymabe dustymabe deleted the dusty-next-devel-fedora-candidate-compose branch November 2, 2023 19:18
@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

FTR: @dustymabe and I discussed this OOB and we agreed that outside of this time period (lead up to GA), we will go back to using the official Fedora repos only.

Slight clarification. I think it should be: "outside of this time period (when next is on pre-release Fedora 'next'), we will go back to using the official Fedora repos only."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants