You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe it would improve the UX of the CLI for submitting proposals if users were allowed to submit them via an optional file instead of direct flags.
Problem Definition
It can be cumbersome to provide such information (especially the description) directly via the command line.
If such a flag is given, the file should be read and the other flags should be ignored (or nice error returned) if given, then parsed, and the remaining logic should be the same.
For Admin Use
Not duplicate issue
Appropriate labels applied
Appropriate contributors tagged
Contributor assigned/self-assigned
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note: I think the @ prefix is often used for reading from files, and might save us an extra CLI flag, e.g. --proposal "I am a potato" vs --proposal @potato.txt.
Summary
I believe it would improve the UX of the CLI for submitting proposals if users were allowed to submit them via an optional file instead of direct flags.
Problem Definition
It can be cumbersome to provide such information (especially the description) directly via the command line.
Proposal
e.g.
If such a flag is given, the file should be read and the other flags should be ignored (or nice error returned) if given, then parsed, and the remaining logic should be the same.
For Admin Use
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: