Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

R4R: Assert store implementations never store nil values #3435

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2019

Conversation

cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

@cwgoes cwgoes commented Jan 29, 2019

Closes #2707

  • Linked to github-issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Wrote tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/)
  • Added entries in PENDING.md with issue #
  • rereviewed Files changed in the github PR explorer

For Admin Use:

  • Added appropriate labels to PR (ex. wip, ready-for-review, docs)
  • Reviewers Assigned
  • Squashed all commits, uses message "Merge pull request #XYZ: [title]" (coding standards)

@cwgoes cwgoes changed the title WIP: Assert store implementations never store nil values R4R: Assert store implementations never store nil values Jan 29, 2019
@cwgoes cwgoes requested a review from mossid January 29, 2019 20:00
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3435 into develop will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 84.61%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3435      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    59.36%   59.39%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          134      135       +1     
  Lines         9972     9975       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits          5920     5925       +5     
+ Misses        3679     3678       -1     
+ Partials       373      372       -1

@cwgoes cwgoes merged commit f66b7b6 into develop Jan 29, 2019
@cwgoes cwgoes deleted the cwgoes/add-store-impl-tests branch January 29, 2019 20:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants