feat: support custom mnemonics in in-process testing network #10922
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@AmauryM any chance you know when the next 0.44.x point release will be made? |
anilcse
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2022
|
Moving this back to draft. I think there's one more change I need to make. |
|
Ok so I was updating the wrong mnemonic code. I tested this on Umee and it works. Moving back out of Draft. This technically breaks an API in the |
I think quite soon would be good, maybe right after the 0.45 one which is more pressing. Any chains demanding the next 0.44.x? |
amaury1093
added
the
A:automerge
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2022
## Description In certain cases, it proves to be beneficial to be able to support user provided mnemonics in the in-process testing network. This essentially allows you to know the validator addresses ahead of time in case you need to do any custom genesis logic (e.g. Gravity Bridge delegation keys). --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit b019083) # Conflicts: # server/init.go # testutil/network/network.go
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2022
## Description In certain cases, it proves to be beneficial to be able to support user provided mnemonics in the in-process testing network. This essentially allows you to know the validator addresses ahead of time in case you need to do any custom genesis logic (e.g. Gravity Bridge delegation keys). --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit b019083) # Conflicts: # server/init.go # testutil/network/network.go
alexanderbez
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
alexanderbez
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
amaury1093
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 2, 2022
jiujiteiro
pushed a commit
to realiotech/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2022
jiujiteiro
pushed a commit
to realiotech/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2022
…port cosmos#10922) (cosmos#10935)" (cosmos#11083) This reverts commit 8bb7a96.
jiujiteiro
pushed a commit
to realiotech/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2022
jiujiteiro
pushed a commit
to realiotech/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2022
…port cosmos#10922) (cosmos#10935)" (cosmos#11083) This reverts commit 8bb7a96.
JimLarson
pushed a commit
to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2022
Eengineer1
pushed a commit
to cheqd/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2022
larry0x
pushed a commit
to larry0x/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2023
…10922) ## Description In certain cases, it proves to be beneficial to be able to support user provided mnemonics in the in-process testing network. This essentially allows you to know the validator addresses ahead of time in case you need to do any custom genesis logic (e.g. Gravity Bridge delegation keys). --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
JeancarloBarrios
pushed a commit
to agoric-labs/cosmos-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
In certain cases, it proves to be beneficial to be able to support user provided mnemonics in the in-process testing network. This essentially allows you to know the validator addresses ahead of time in case you need to do any custom genesis logic (e.g. Gravity Bridge delegation keys).
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking change