-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: change tmblock to sdkblock #11390
Conversation
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ message GetBlockByHeightRequest { | |||
// GetBlockByHeightResponse is the response type for the Query/GetBlockByHeight RPC method. | |||
message GetBlockByHeightResponse { | |||
.tendermint.types.BlockID block_id = 1; | |||
.tendermint.types.Block block = 2; | |||
Block block = 2; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We unfortunately can't do that without bumping to v1beta2.
Can we instead add a new field in the Response message?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
blocking for now because it is proto breaking
@atheeshp Do we also have an endpoint for SDK blocks? maybe we can just put the bech32 addresses in that block. |
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ message GetLatestBlockRequest {} | |||
// GetLatestBlockResponse is the response type for the Query/GetLatestBlock RPC method. | |||
message GetLatestBlockResponse { | |||
.tendermint.types.BlockID block_id = 1; | |||
.tendermint.types.Block block = 2; | |||
Block block = 2; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we can't change this, neither here nor on the TxService as marko suggested here #11390 (comment), because both would be proto-breaking.
What we can do is simply add a new proposer
string field to either or both of these 2 response types.
The alternative is to add a new field sdk_block
on either or both of these 2 response types, which has the new Block type.
Punting this to later, when 0.46 QA is done. |
@atheeshp should we assign this to someone else or are you fine to finish it |
I can continue this, this is halted due to 0.46. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall lgtm, let's also add a changelog. I propose to deprecate the usage of the TM block type, and just use ours.
@@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ message GetBlockByHeightRequest { | |||
message GetBlockByHeightResponse { | |||
.tendermint.types.BlockID block_id = 1; | |||
.tendermint.types.Block block = 2; | |||
Block sdk_block = 3; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's add a comment "Since", and also what's the difference between this and block
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a field proposer_address
with type bytes
in tm block, and in sdk block it is changed to string
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezobchuk <alexanderbez@users.noreply.github.com>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11390 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 65.32% 65.27% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 693 694 +1
Lines 71823 71851 +28
==========================================
- Hits 46916 46899 -17
- Misses 22268 22314 +46
+ Partials 2639 2638 -1
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, should we backport this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, I added some suggestions for comments to make it clear what we're doing here.
.tendermint.types.Block block = 2 [deprecated = true]; | ||
|
||
// since: v0.47 | ||
Block sdk_block = 3; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure about the sdk_block
name. Any other ideas, maybe @alexanderbez ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess the main issue with naming here is no matter what in the future we will rename it to block instead of whatever its called. It might be fine for now then
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @atheeshp
## Description Closes: #3544 --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit e89db04) # Conflicts: # api/cosmos/base/tendermint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.go # client/grpc/tmservice/query.pb.go
* refactor: change tmblock to sdkblock (#11390) ## Description Closes: #3544 --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit e89db04) # Conflicts: # api/cosmos/base/tendermint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.go # client/grpc/tmservice/query.pb.go * resolve conflicts * remove api/ Co-authored-by: atheeshp <59333759+atheeshp@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: atheesh <atheesh@vitwit.com>
…12549) * refactor: change tmblock to sdkblock (cosmos#11390) ## Description Closes: cosmos#3544 --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable) (cherry picked from commit e89db04) # Conflicts: # api/cosmos/base/tendermint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.go # client/grpc/tmservice/query.pb.go * resolve conflicts * remove api/ Co-authored-by: atheeshp <59333759+atheeshp@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: atheesh <atheesh@vitwit.com>
Description
Closes: #3544
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change