Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add note about checking spec to the PR template #1898

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2018
Merged

Add note about checking spec to the PR template #1898

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2018

Conversation

jackzampolin
Copy link
Member

This PR adds a quick note about checking the Spec to the PR template. I added to an existing item.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (develop@9841a2d). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #1898   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   63.83%           
==========================================
  Files              ?      118           
  Lines              ?     7024           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?     4484           
  Misses             ?     2285           
  Partials           ?      255

Copy link
Contributor

@cwgoes cwgoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

That said, I don't think this really addresses the problem as discussed in the retro - the reviewer just reading the spec isn't enough (or doesn't appear to have been); we need some sort of "deep review" process by which the reviewer(s) can really reason through the logic and catch edge cases that the author might have missed.

@cwgoes cwgoes merged commit 840d915 into cosmos:develop Aug 1, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants