Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

!Feat/client v2 #19738

Closed
wants to merge 19 commits into from
Closed

!Feat/client v2 #19738

wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

raynaudoe
Copy link
Contributor

@raynaudoe raynaudoe commented Mar 12, 2024

Description

This PR aims to:

  • Remove unwanted dependencies such as x/tx, x/auth, specific crypto types (multisig related types, direct references to secp256k1).

  • New TxBuilder interface:

    • independent from sdk's modules
    • only use gogo proto types for easier implementations
  • New Factory struct:

    • cleaner imports
    • Sign() is now a Factory's method
  • New Context struct for client cmds: Located in internal/x/context.go. Will avoid struct bleeding across other modules.

  • Medium refactor of TxConfig:

TODO:

Closes:


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 12, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the C:CLI label Mar 12, 2024
client/v2/tx/builder.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
client/v2/tx/builder.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
client/v2/tx/config.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
client/v2/tx/factory.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
client/v2/tx/factory.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
client/v2/tx/factory.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
client/v2/tx/tx.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
types/tx_msg_v2.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
client/v2/tx/query.go Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
client/v2/tx/tx.go Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
Comment on lines 103 to 105
for k := range options.CustomGetSigners {
customGetSignerFuncs[k] = options.CustomGetSigners[k]
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
@julienrbrt julienrbrt self-requested a review April 22, 2024 14:18
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice work! left a few comments

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks quite duplicated from x/tx

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we could simplify the apis here, we don't need so many


// Context implements a typical context created in SDK modules for transaction
// handling and queries.
type Context struct {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need all those information? Like From, FromName and FromAddress could only be set to one thing (and when using a from name we directly query the keyring -- if possible).
This looks like mostly the exact same one that we have currently

@github-actions github-actions bot added the C:x/tx label May 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jun 11, 2024
@JulianToledano JulianToledano mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2024
12 tasks
@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2024
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants