refactor(core): core review (1/n) #21193
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes enhance type safety and documentation within the codebase. The Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
core/app/app.go (1)
23-23: Issues found in struct usage.The change to restrict the type parameter to
transaction.Txenhances type safety and clarity. However, there are several usages ofBlockRequestin the codebase that need to be updated to match the new type restriction.
File:
server/v2/stf/stf_test.go
- Lines: Multiple instances where
BlockRequestis used withmock.Txinstead oftransaction.Tx.File:
server/v2/appmanager/appmanager.go
- Lines: Multiple instances where
BlockRequestis used with a generic typeTinstead oftransaction.Tx.File:
server/v2/cometbft/abci.go
- Lines: Multiple instances where
BlockRequestis used with a generic typeTinstead oftransaction.Tx.Please update these usages to ensure compatibility with the new type restriction.
Analysis chain
LGTM! But verify the struct usage in the codebase.
The change to restrict the type parameter to
transaction.Txenhances type safety and clarity.However, ensure that all usages of
BlockRequestare updated to match the new type restriction.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `BlockRequest` match the new type restriction. # Test: Search for the struct usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new type restriction. rg --type go -A 5 $'BlockRequest'Length of output: 216217
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- core/app/app.go (1 hunks)
- core/store/service.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- core/store/service.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
core/app/app.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
julienrbrt
changed the title
Description
ref: #21176
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
TransientStoreServiceinterface, clarifying its availability limitations in server/v2 applications.Improvements
transaction.Txtypes can be utilized in theBlockRequest.