-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(x/slashing): audit x/slashing changes #21270
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes across the Cosmos SDK's slashing module enhance clarity and performance. Key updates include improved error handling, streamlined address initialization, and refined documentation. The handling of validator signatures is now more robust, with comments and workflows optimized for readability. These adjustments not only clarify existing logic but also prevent potential runtime issues, ultimately contributing to a more maintainable codebase. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
x/slashing/abci.go (2)
18-20
: Clarify comment for better understanding.The comment should be more explicit about the process of handling validator votes and the consequences of missed blocks.
- // Retrieve CometBFT info, then iterate through all validator votes - // from the last commit. For each vote, handle the validator's signature, potentially - // slashing or unbonding validators who have missed too many blocks. + // Retrieve CometBFT information and iterate through all validator votes + // from the last commit. For each vote, process the validator's signature + // to determine if slashing or unbonding is necessary due to missed blocks.
Line range hint
21-29
:
Ensure error handling covers all edge cases.The
BeginBlocker
function handles errors fromParams.Get
andHandleValidatorSignatureWithParams
. Consider logging these errors for better traceability and debugging.if err != nil { // Log the error for better traceability return err }
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- x/slashing/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- x/slashing/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/slashing/keeper/grpc_query.go (2 hunks)
- x/slashing/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/slashing/keeper/infractions.go (2 hunks)
- x/slashing/keeper/keeper.go (2 hunks)
- x/slashing/keeper/keeper_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/slashing/keeper/signing_info.go (1 hunks)
- x/slashing/keeper/signing_info_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/slashing/migrations/v4/migrate.go (4 hunks)
- x/slashing/migrations/v4/migrate_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/slashing/simulation/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- x/slashing/CHANGELOG.md
- x/slashing/keeper/infractions.go
- x/slashing/keeper/keeper_test.go
- x/slashing/keeper/signing_info_test.go
- x/slashing/migrations/v4/migrate.go
- x/slashing/migrations/v4/migrate_test.go
- x/slashing/simulation/genesis_test.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (5)
x/slashing/abci.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/slashing/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/slashing/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/slashing/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/slashing/keeper/signing_info.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (7)
x/slashing/keeper/grpc_query.go (1)
Line range hint
37-59
:
Verify the impact of receiver type change.The change from
Keeper
toQuerier
as the receiver type suggests a shift in responsibility. Ensure that this change aligns with the architectural design and does not introduce inconsistencies.Verification successful
Receiver Type Change Verified
The change from
Keeper
toQuerier
as the receiver type for theSigningInfo
andSigningInfos
functions is consistent with the architectural design. There are no inconsistencies found in the implementation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the change from `Keeper` to `Querier` as the receiver type is consistent across the codebase. # Test: Search for all instances of `SigningInfo` and `SigningInfos` to ensure consistent usage. rg --type go 'func (k Querier) SigningInfo' -A 5 rg --type go 'func (k Querier) SigningInfos' -A 5Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the SigningInfo function with Keeper as the receiver type rg --type go 'func (k Keeper) SigningInfo' -A 5 # Search for the SigningInfos function with Keeper as the receiver type rg --type go 'func (k Keeper) SigningInfos' -A 5 # Re-check for the SigningInfo function with Querier as the receiver type rg --type go 'func (k Querier) SigningInfo' -A 5 # Re-check for the SigningInfos function with Querier as the receiver type rg --type go 'func (k Querier) SigningInfos' -A 5Length of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all functions in the grpc_query.go file to identify any discrepancies or relevant functions fd 'grpc_query.go' | xargs -I {} rg --type go '^func ' {}Length of output: 19634
x/slashing/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (2)
49-49
: Ensure consistency in consensus address handling.The use of
consStr
directly in theQuerySigningInfoRequest
improves clarity. Ensure thatconsStr
is correctly initialized and used consistently across test cases.
59-62
: Simplify consensus address initialization.The direct use of string literals for
consAddr1
andconsAddr2
enhances readability. Ensure that these changes are consistently applied across all relevant test cases.x/slashing/keeper/keeper.go (3)
93-93
: Typo correction in comments approved.The correction of "intraction" to "infraction" in the comment improves clarity.
99-99
: Typo correction in comments approved.The correction of "intraction" to "infraction" in the comment improves clarity.
140-142
: Streamlined control flow inJail
method approved.The direct return of the event emission result simplifies the logic and reduces code complexity.
x/slashing/keeper/signing_info.go (1)
26-34
: Enhanced error handling inJailUntil
approved.Using
types.ErrNoSigningInfoFound.Wrapf
provides more specific error reporting, improving clarity and accuracy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr> (cherry picked from commit 67ed23b)
Description
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests