Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(x/protocolpool): audit QA #21337

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024
Merged

refactor(x/protocolpool): audit QA #21337

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

lucaslopezf
Copy link
Contributor

@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf commented Aug 17, 2024

Description

PR related to #20955


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated URLs in the protocolpool documentation to reflect new repository structure and versioning.
  • Code Improvements

    • Enhanced code maintainability by replacing hardcoded strings with constants in the module address creation.
    • Simplified function signatures by marking unused parameters, improving readability.
    • Introduced a new constant for error messages to centralize error handling in the code.
  • Tests

    • Added new tests for poolKeeper functionality to improve coverage, including community pool retrieval and distribution logic.
  • Chores

    • Cleaned up code to prevent compiler warnings about unused parameters.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 17, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes across the protocolpool module primarily enhance documentation accuracy, improve code clarity, and increase maintainability. Updates include modifying URLs in documentation, refining function signatures to indicate unused parameters, and introducing constants for error messages. New test cases were added to strengthen coverage for functionality related to the community pool. Overall, these updates do not alter the core logic but ensure better alignment with best practices in coding and documentation.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../README.md Updated URLs in documentation for alignment with release/v0.52.x.
.../depinject.go Changed hardcoded "gov" to types.GovModuleName in ProvideModule for improved maintainability.
.../keeper/grpc_query.go Modified CommunityPool method to indicate unused parameter with _ instead of req.
.../keeper/keeper.go Introduced constant errModuleAccountNotSet for centralized error message management in NewKeeper.
.../keeper/keeper_test.go Added new tests TestGetCommunityPool and TestSetToDistribute to enhance coverage for community pool logic.
.../simulation/operations.go Updated function signatures in WeightedOperations and SimulateMsgFundCommunityPool to mark unused parameters.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Querier
    participant Keeper
    participant BankKeeper

    User->>Querier: Request community pool info
    Querier->>Keeper: GetCommunityPool
    Keeper-->>Querier: Return pool amount
    Querier-->>User: Send community pool info

    User->>Keeper: Set distribution amount
    Keeper->>BankKeeper: Update balances
    BankKeeper-->>Keeper: Confirm balance updated
    Keeper-->>User: Acknowledge distribution set
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2024
28 tasks
@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf marked this pull request as ready for review August 17, 2024 19:44
@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf requested a review from a team as a code owner August 17, 2024 19:44
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
x/protocolpool/README.md (1)

163-163: Add a comma before "or".

Consider adding a comma before "or" to connect two independent clauses.

- until expiry time is reached or continuous fund request is canceled.
+ until expiry time is reached, or continuous fund request is canceled.
Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~163-~163: Use a comma before “or” if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...n continues until expiry time is reached or continuous fund request is canceled. `...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 651868a and abc15dc.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • x/protocolpool/README.md (7 hunks)
  • x/protocolpool/depinject.go (1 hunks)
  • x/protocolpool/keeper/grpc_query.go (1 hunks)
  • x/protocolpool/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
  • x/protocolpool/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/protocolpool/simulation/operations.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • x/protocolpool/keeper/grpc_query.go
  • x/protocolpool/keeper/keeper.go
  • x/protocolpool/simulation/operations.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
x/protocolpool/depinject.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

x/protocolpool/README.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

x/protocolpool/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

LanguageTool
x/protocolpool/README.md

[uncategorized] ~163-~163: Use a comma before “or” if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...n continues until expiry time is reached or continuous fund request is canceled. `...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)

Additional comments not posted (3)
x/protocolpool/depinject.go (1)

51-51: LGTM! Use of constant for module address.

Replacing the hardcoded string with types.GovModuleName enhances maintainability and reduces potential errors.

x/protocolpool/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)

164-180: LGTM! TestGetCommunityPool improves coverage.

The test effectively verifies the retrieval of the community pool balance and handles error scenarios.


182-221: LGTM! TestSetToDistribute enhances test coverage.

The test checks the correct setting of distributions and handles scenarios with zero balances.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Aug 17, 2024
suite.Require().Contains(err.Error(), "module account protocolpool does not exist")
}

func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) TestSetToDistribute() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think @facundomedica is going to change the behavior of this (or maybe only in begin blocker). ACK for now, but probably this test will have to change.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0add6d5 Aug 19, 2024
75 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the lucas/audits branch August 19, 2024 08:06
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2024
julienrbrt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2024
Co-authored-by: Lucas Francisco López <lucaslopezf@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release C:Simulations C:x/protocolpool
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants