Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(types): audit QA #21355

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

refactor(types): audit QA #21355

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

akhilkumarpilli
Copy link
Contributor

@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli commented Aug 19, 2024

Description

ref: #20955


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation Updates

    • Simplified comments related to the TxResponse struct and events field for clarity.
    • Updated deprecation notices in the Context struct to reflect a new timeline for feature removal.
  • New Features

    • Introduced new test functions to enhance coverage for context handling in the SDK.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved clarity in the IsSorted method documentation without altering functionality.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined constant declarations and improved variable grouping in the address testing file.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to various files in the codebase, including modifications to documentation comments, struct fields, and test cases. Key adjustments include the removal of historical context in comments, the introduction of new helper functions, and enhancements to test coverage for context handling. Deprecation notices for specific fields and methods have been updated to reflect a revised timeline, ensuring clarity in the codebase.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
api/cosmos/base/abci/v1beta1/abci.pulsar.go, proto/cosmos/base/abci/v1beta1/abci.proto Removal of comments providing historical context for the TxResponse struct and events field, simplifying documentation without altering functionality.
types/address_test.go Restructuring of constants and variable declarations, introduction of the setConfigWithPrefix function, and updates to test cases for improved clarity.
types/coin.go Minor modification to the comment documentation of the IsSorted method for improved readability without changing functionality.
types/context.go Updates to deprecation notices for fields and methods in the Context struct, extending the timeline for removal to version 0.52.
types/context_test.go Introduction of new test functions to enhance coverage related to context handling, including tests for TryUnwrapSDKContext, ToSDKEvidence, and related methods.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli changed the title (WIP) refactor(types): audit types changes refactor(types): audit QA Aug 26, 2024
@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2024 10:48
@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli requested a review from a team as a code owner August 26, 2024 10:48
@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2024
28 tasks
@akhilkumarpilli akhilkumarpilli added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Aug 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28c792b and 1cbfb44.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • types/abci.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (6)
  • api/cosmos/base/abci/v1beta1/abci.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
  • proto/cosmos/base/abci/v1beta1/abci.proto (1 hunks)
  • types/address_test.go (16 hunks)
  • types/coin.go (1 hunks)
  • types/context.go (5 hunks)
  • types/context_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • api/cosmos/base/abci/v1beta1/abci.pulsar.go
  • proto/cosmos/base/abci/v1beta1/abci.proto
  • types/coin.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
types/context_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

types/context.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

types/address_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Additional comments not posted (14)
types/context_test.go (4)

236-254: LGTM!

The function TestTryUnwrapSDKContext is comprehensive and covers various scenarios effectively.

The code changes are approved.


256-287: LGTM!

The function TestToSDKEvidence is correctly implemented and ensures the conversion is accurate.

The code changes are approved.


289-319: LGTM!

The function TestToSDKCommitInfo is correctly implemented and ensures the conversion is accurate.

The code changes are approved.


321-351: LGTM!

The function TestToSDKExtendedCommitInfo is correctly implemented and ensures the conversion is accurate.

The code changes are approved.

types/context.go (5)

48-48: LGTM!

The deprecation notice for voteInfo has been correctly updated to version 0.52.

The code changes are approved.


51-51: LGTM!

The deprecation notice for checkTx has been correctly updated to version 0.52.

The code changes are approved.


52-52: LGTM!

The deprecation notice for recheckTx has been correctly updated to version 0.52.

The code changes are approved.


105-107: LGTM!

The deprecation notice for ConsensusParams has been correctly updated to version 0.52.

The code changes are approved.


211-213: LGTM!

The deprecation notice for WithVoteInfos has been correctly updated to version 0.52.

The code changes are approved.

types/address_test.go (5)

50-51: LGTM!

The new variables addr10byte and addr20byte are correctly declared and enhance code readability.

The code changes are approved.


161-165: LGTM!

The new helper function setConfigWithPrefix improves code readability and maintainability by consolidating the logic for setting bech32 prefixes.

The code changes are approved.


179-179: LGTM!

The usage of the new helper function setConfigWithPrefix in TestAddrCache simplifies the test setup and enhances readability.

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 186-186


212-212: LGTM!

The usage of the new helper function setConfigWithPrefix in TestAddrCacheDisabled simplifies the test setup and enhances readability.

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 219-219


530-532: LGTM!

The new test case TestMustValAddressFromBech32 is correctly implemented and ensures the method works as expected.

The code changes are approved.

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 27, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e98b8e9 Aug 27, 2024
76 of 80 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the akhil/types-audit branch August 27, 2024 12:23
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
(cherry picked from commit e98b8e9)

# Conflicts:
#	api/cosmos/base/abci/v1beta1/abci.pulsar.go
julienrbrt added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024
Co-authored-by: Akhil Kumar P <36399231+akhilkumarpilli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants