Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(x/circuit): audit QA #21370

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

refactor(x/circuit): audit QA #21370

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

lucaslopezf
Copy link
Contributor

@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf commented Aug 20, 2024

Description

PR related to #20955


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated URLs in the circuit module documentation to point to the latest release version, ensuring accurate and reliable access to resources.
  • Improvements

    • Introduced a new constant for the governance module name to enhance code clarity and maintainability.
  • Testing

    • Added a new unit test for the IsAllowed method, improving test coverage and verifying message permissions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the circuit module of the Cosmos SDK focus on updating documentation URLs to the latest release version for improved accuracy. Additionally, hardcoded values in the code have been replaced with constants to enhance maintainability. A new test function has been added to increase test coverage for the IsAllowed method, contributing to the module's reliability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
x/circuit/README.md Updated documentation URLs to point to release/v0.52.x, enhancing accuracy and clarity.
x/circuit/ante/circuit_test.go Modified IsAllowed function to remove unused ctx parameter, simplifying the signature.
x/circuit/depinject.go Added import of types, and updated authority initialization to use GovModuleName constant.
x/circuit/keeper/genesis_test.go Replaced hardcoded "gov" string with types.GovModuleName constant for improved maintainability.
x/circuit/keeper/keeper_test.go Modified governance address instantiation to use constant and added TestIsAllowed for better test coverage.
x/circuit/types/keys.go Introduced GovModuleName constant to avoid cyclic dependencies and enhance clarity.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2024 14:33
@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf requested a review from a team as a code owner August 20, 2024 14:33
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27d3d48 and 7ea5ecc.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • x/circuit/README.md (4 hunks)
  • x/circuit/ante/circuit_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/circuit/depinject.go (2 hunks)
  • x/circuit/keeper/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
  • x/circuit/keeper/keeper_test.go (2 hunks)
  • x/circuit/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • x/circuit/README.md
  • x/circuit/ante/circuit_test.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
x/circuit/types/keys.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

x/circuit/depinject.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

x/circuit/keeper/genesis_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/circuit/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Additional comments not posted (5)
x/circuit/types/keys.go (1)

12-15: LGTM! Ensure synchronization with the governance module.

The introduction of GovModuleName enhances maintainability by avoiding hardcoded strings. Ensure that this constant remains synchronized with the governance module's name to prevent issues.

x/circuit/depinject.go (1)

11-11: LGTM! Verify usage of GovModuleName.

The change to use GovModuleName enhances maintainability. Ensure consistent usage of this constant throughout the codebase.

Also applies to: 50-50

Verification successful

GovModuleName Usage Verified

The GovModuleName constant is consistently used across the codebase to avoid cyclic dependencies, as indicated by the comments. Its usage in creating module addresses is uniform across various modules and test files. No inconsistencies were found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of `GovModuleName` throughout the codebase.

# Test: Search for usages of `GovModuleName`. Expect: All usages should refer to the constant.
rg --type go 'GovModuleName'

Length of output: 4144

x/circuit/keeper/genesis_test.go (1)

47-47: LGTM!

The use of GovModuleName instead of a hardcoded string enhances maintainability. The test setup logic remains intact.

x/circuit/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)

49-49: LGTM!

The use of GovModuleName enhances maintainability and clarity.


170-206: Great use of table-driven tests in TestIsAllowed.

The TestIsAllowed function is well-structured, covering various scenarios effectively. This improves test coverage and reliability.

x/circuit/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Aug 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7ea5ecc and f18776f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/circuit/README.md (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • x/circuit/README.md

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9bc5df6 Aug 26, 2024
75 checks passed
@lucaslopezf lucaslopezf deleted the lucas/circuit-audit branch August 26, 2024 09:30
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2024
julienrbrt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: Lucas Francisco López <lucaslopezf@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release C:x/circuit
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants