-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(x/bank): audit QA #21459
refactor(x/bank): audit QA #21459
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to several test files and a simulation proposal file within the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- x/bank/keeper/genesis_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bank/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (5 hunks)
- x/bank/simulation/proposals.go (1 hunks)
- x/bank/simulation/proposals_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- x/bank/keeper/genesis_test.go
- x/bank/simulation/proposals_test.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
x/bank/simulation/proposals.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/bank/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"
Additional comments not posted (6)
x/bank/simulation/proposals.go (1)
37-37
: LGTM!The change to use
types.GovModuleName
instead of a hardcoded string "gov" improves code maintainability and reduces the risk of errors.x/bank/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (5)
24-24
: LGTM!The change to use
suite.authKeeper.AddressCodec().BytesToString(addr)
instead ofcodectestutil.CodecOptions{}.GetAddressCodec().BytesToString(addr)
improves consistency and potentially improves the reliability of address handling within the tests.
110-110
: LGTM!The change to use
suite.authKeeper.AddressCodec().BytesToString(addr)
instead ofcodectestutil.CodecOptions{}.GetAddressCodec().BytesToString(addr)
improves consistency and potentially improves the reliability of address handling within the tests.
183-183
: LGTM!The change to use
suite.authKeeper.AddressCodec().BytesToString(addr)
instead ofcodectestutil.CodecOptions{}.GetAddressCodec().BytesToString(addr)
improves consistency and potentially improves the reliability of address handling within the tests.
Line range hint
200-200
: LGTM!The change to use
suite.authKeeper.AddressCodec().BytesToString(addr)
instead ofcodectestutil.CodecOptions{}.GetAddressCodec().BytesToString(addr)
improves consistency and potentially improves the reliability of address handling within the tests.
601-693
: LGTM!The new test function
TestGRPCDenomMetadataV2
enhances the overall test coverage for the bank module, particularly for the new metadata functionalities.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice cleanup!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!
(cherry picked from commit 43f59c8)
Description
ref: #20955
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes