Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(baseapp): audit QA v0.52 #21515

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JulianToledano
Copy link
Contributor

@JulianToledano JulianToledano commented Sep 3, 2024

Description

Ref:


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation Enhancements

    • Improved comments and documentation for methods in the BaseApp class, enhancing clarity for future developers.
    • Corrected typographical errors in comments related to the ValidatorStore interface and validation functions.
  • Code Improvements

    • Simplified control flow in the MakeHybridHandler function for better readability.
    • Updated logging functionality in the EnableIndexer method to use a standardized key.
  • Test Adjustments

    • Renamed a test function for clarity regarding vote extension validation.

@JulianToledano JulianToledano added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Sep 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to various files in the baseapp directory, primarily focusing on enhancing comments for clarity, correcting typographical errors, and modifying method receivers for consistency. Additionally, there are adjustments to logging practices and control flow simplifications. These modifications aim to improve documentation, readability, and maintainability without altering the existing logic or functionality of the code.

Changes

Files Change Summary
baseapp/abci.go, baseapp/abci_utils.go, baseapp/abci_utils_test.go, baseapp/genesis.go, baseapp/internal/protocompat/protocompat.go, baseapp/msg_service_router.go, baseapp/streaming.go, baseapp/test_helpers.go Enhancements to comments for clarity, correction of typographical errors, renaming of a test function for accuracy, modification of method receiver naming, simplification of control flow, and updates to logging practices.

Tip

We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@JulianToledano JulianToledano mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2024
28 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@alpe alpe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 nice updates

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
baseapp/msg_service_router.go (1)

Line range hint 44-48: Nitpick: Consider making the circuitBreaker field private.

The removal of the circuitBreaker initialization is fine since it can be set using the SetCircuit method after creating a new MsgServiceRouter instance.

As a minor refactor, consider making the circuitBreaker field private (unexported) since it is not accessed outside the MsgServiceRouter struct and can only be set using the SetCircuit method.

type MsgServiceRouter struct {
	interfaceRegistry codectypes.InterfaceRegistry
	routes            map[string]MsgServiceHandler
	hybridHandlers    map[string]func(ctx context.Context, req, resp protoiface.MessageV1) error
	responseByMsgName map[string]string
-	circuitBreaker    CircuitBreaker
+	circuitBreaker    CircuitBreaker
}
Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3d8378 and d291d0b.

Files selected for processing (8)
  • baseapp/abci.go (2 hunks)
  • baseapp/abci_utils.go (2 hunks)
  • baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/genesis.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/internal/protocompat/protocompat.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/msg_service_router.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/streaming.go (2 hunks)
  • baseapp/test_helpers.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
  • baseapp/abci.go
  • baseapp/abci_utils.go
  • baseapp/abci_utils_test.go
  • baseapp/genesis.go
  • baseapp/internal/protocompat/protocompat.go
  • baseapp/streaming.go
  • baseapp/test_helpers.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
baseapp/msg_service_router.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3d8378 and d291d0b.

Files selected for processing (8)
  • baseapp/abci.go (2 hunks)
  • baseapp/abci_utils.go (2 hunks)
  • baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/genesis.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/internal/protocompat/protocompat.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/msg_service_router.go (1 hunks)
  • baseapp/streaming.go (2 hunks)
  • baseapp/test_helpers.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
  • baseapp/abci.go
  • baseapp/abci_utils.go
  • baseapp/abci_utils_test.go
  • baseapp/genesis.go
  • baseapp/internal/protocompat/protocompat.go
  • baseapp/test_helpers.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
baseapp/streaming.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/msg_service_router.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Additional comments not posted (2)
baseapp/streaming.go (1)

40-40: LGTM!

The code change is approved for the following reasons:

  • Enhances consistency and maintainability by leveraging a predefined constant log.ModuleKey instead of a string literal.
  • Helps prevent potential typos and improves clarity in log categorization.
  • Aligns with best practices in logging by using a standardized key.

The overall control flow and logic of the EnableIndexer method remain unchanged.

baseapp/msg_service_router.go (1)

Line range hint 44-48: Verify the impact of removing the circuitBreaker field initialization.

The circuitBreaker field is no longer being initialized to nil during the creation of a new MsgServiceRouter instance. This change suggests that the circuit breaker functionality will be managed differently or is no longer necessary for the router's initialization.

To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:

The code change conforms to the Uber Golang style guide.

Verification successful

Verification Complete: No Issues Found with circuitBreaker Initialization Removal

The removal of the circuitBreaker field initialization to nil in the NewMsgServiceRouter function does not negatively impact the control flow or error handling. The circuitBreaker is set directly elsewhere in the code and is checked for nil before use, ensuring that its functionality is preserved.

  • The circuitBreaker is directly assigned a value with msr.circuitBreaker = cb.
  • It is actively used in control flow and error handling, with checks for nil to ensure proper operation.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: 
# - Verify if the `circuitBreaker` field is being set using the `SetCircuit` method after creating a new `MsgServiceRouter` instance.
# - Check if the `circuitBreaker` field is being used in the control flow and error handling related to message service routing.

# Test 1: Search for usage of `SetCircuit` method. Expect: At least one occurrence.
echo "Searching for usage of SetCircuit method..."
rg --type go $'msr\.SetCircuit' 

# Test 2: Search for usage of `circuitBreaker` field in the control flow and error handling. Expect: Relevant occurrences.
echo "Searching for usage of circuitBreaker field in the control flow and error handling..."  
rg --type go $'msr\.circuitBreaker' -A 10

Length of output: 3013

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 54b49d4 Sep 3, 2024
78 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julian/audit-0.52-baseapp branch September 3, 2024 14:15
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2024
julienrbrt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2024
Co-authored-by: Julián Toledano <JulianToledano@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants