Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(math): refactor ApproxRoot for readality #22263

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

xujiangyu
Copy link
Contributor

@xujiangyu xujiangyu commented Oct 15, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the ApproxRoot method to handle zero as a root parameter, improving calculation accuracy.
    • Expanded test coverage with new cases for root calculations, including edge scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified logic for root calculation, ensuring clearer handling of base cases and negative inputs.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments for better clarity on the method's functionality and logic.

@xujiangyu xujiangyu requested review from testinginprod, alpe and a team as code owners October 15, 2024 03:46
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the ApproxRoot method of the LegacyDec struct in the math/dec.go file. A new condition is added to handle cases where the root parameter is zero, returning LegacyOneDec(). The logic for iterative approximation has been simplified by removing a condition related to delta, relying instead on the new condition to determine when to break the loop. Comments have also been updated for clarity regarding the method's behavior with negative inputs and the approximation process.

Changes

File Change Summary
math/dec.go Modified ApproxRoot method to handle zero root parameter, updated comments, and simplified loop logic.
math/dec_test.go Enhanced decimalTestSuite with new test cases for TestApproxRoot and updated TestApproxSqrt.

Possibly related PRs

  • tests(math): fix zero value test #21821: The changes in this PR involve testing zero values in the math/dec_test.go file, which is relevant to the modifications made to the ApproxRoot method that now includes handling the case when the root parameter is zero.

Suggested reviewers

  • alpe
  • julienrbrt
  • testinginprod
  • akhilkumarpilli

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ff753f and 18c263c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • math/dec_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
math/dec_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

🔇 Additional comments (1)
math/dec_test.go (1)

452-454: LGTM! Good addition of edge case tests.

The new test cases properly cover important edge cases:

  1. When root is 0 (returning OneDec)
  2. When input is 0 (returning 0)

These additions improve the test coverage and help validate the behavior of ApproxRoot for these boundary conditions.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
math/dec.go (1)

470-473: LGTM: Good addition for handling root == 0 case.

The new condition to handle the case when root is zero is a good improvement. It correctly returns LegacyOneDec() for this special case.

Consider updating the comment to be more precise:

-- Return 1 as root 0 of any number is considered 1.
++ Return 1 as the 0th root of any number is undefined, but 1 is a sensible default.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4274dcf and 6bf5fbd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • math/dec.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
math/dec.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
math/dec.go (2)

470-504: Summary: Improvements to ApproxRoot function

The changes to the ApproxRoot function are well-implemented and improve both functionality and readability:

  1. Addition of a special case for root == 0.
  2. Simplification of the loop condition.
  3. Updated comments for better clarity.

These modifications enhance the function without altering its core behavior. The changes are localized and shouldn't negatively impact other parts of the codebase.


488-504: Approve simplification of loop condition.

The simplification of the loop condition improves readability while maintaining the same functionality. The new condition delta.Abs().LTE(smallestDec) is a clear and concise way to determine when to break the loop.

Let's verify if this change affects other parts of the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Approve the simplification of the loop condition.

The change is localized to the ApproxRoot function within math/dec.go and is covered by existing tests in math/dec_test.go. No other parts of the codebase are affected by this modification.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other usages of ApproxRoot function
# and verify if they rely on the old loop condition.

# Search for ApproxRoot function calls
rg --type go "ApproxRoot\(" -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 3068

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title refact(math/):refact ApproxRoot for readality refactor(math):refact ApproxRoot for readality Oct 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@alpe alpe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good! More readable and efficient code. 👍
It would be great if you could add a test scenario to for root=0 to the test-suite. This would help with regression.

delta.Set(d).QuoMut(prev)
delta.SubMut(guess)
delta.QuoInt64Mut(int64(root))

guess.AddMut(delta)

// Stop when delta is small enough
if delta.Abs().LTE(smallestDec) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 more readable

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title refactor(math):refact ApproxRoot for readality refactor(math): refactor ApproxRoot for readality Oct 23, 2024
@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@xujiangyu, let's add the recommended test by @alpe before merging.

@xujiangyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xujiangyu, let's add the recommended test by @alpe before merging.

ok, I‘ll add it

@xujiangyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xujiangyu, let's add the recommended test by @alpe before merging.

The test cases where root==0 or input == 0 were add. Tks for advice.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
math/dec_test.go (1)

452-454: Test cases don't fully validate the zero root handling.

While the added test cases cover the basic zero root scenario, they don't validate important edge cases such as negative inputs with zero root. Consider adding test cases for:

  1. Negative numbers with zero root
  2. Very large numbers with zero root
  3. Very small numbers (close to zero) with zero root

Example test cases to add:

{math.LegacyNewDec(-2), 0, math.LegacyOneDec()},                                   // -2 ^ 0 => 1.0
{math.LegacyNewDecWithPrec(1, 18), 0, math.LegacyOneDec()},                       // 0.000000000000000001 ^ 0 => 1.0
{math.LegacyNewDecFromInt(math.NewInt(999999999)), 0, math.LegacyOneDec()},       // 999999999 ^ 0 => 1.0
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6bf5fbd and 3ff753f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • math/dec_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
math/dec_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

@xujiangyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@julienrbrt ,hey bro, the requirements seem to be difficult to complete. Could you help to hand-merge?

auto-merge was automatically disabled October 30, 2024 01:39

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@xujiangyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

xujiangyu commented Oct 30, 2024

image
The error seens wired, I have always passed the test case. Maybe some changes were not commited in my local envs.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 30, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 30, 2024
@sontrinh16 sontrinh16 added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit ee16adb Oct 30, 2024
70 of 72 checks passed
alpe added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
* main: (24 commits)
  build(deps): upgrade to iavl@v1.3.1 (#22436)
  docs: Update tendermint validators query pagination documentation (#22412)
  refactor(client/v2): offchain uses client/v2/factory (#22344)
  feat: wire new handlers to grpc (#22333)
  fix(x/group): proper address rendering in error (#22425)
  refactor(serevr/v2/cometbft): update `RegisterQueryHandlers` and GRPC queries (#22403)
  docs: update ADR 59 (#22423)
  build(deps): Bump github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify from 1.7.0 to 1.8.0 in /tools/cosmovisor (#22407)
  docs: Module account address documentation (#22289)
  feat(baseapp): add per message telemetry (#22175)
  docs: Update Twitter Links to X in Documentation (#22408)
  docs: redirect the remote generation page (#22404)
  refactor(serverv2): remove unused interface methods, honuor context  (#22394)
  fix(server/v2): return ErrHelp (#22399)
  feat(indexer): implement `schema.HasModuleCodec` interface in the `bank` module (#22349)
  refactor(math): refactor ApproxRoot for readality (#22263)
  docs: fix KWallet Handbook (#22395)
  feat(client/v2): broadcast logic (#22282)
  refactor(server/v2): eager config loading (#22267)
  test(system): check feePayers signature (#22389)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants