docs: Update content in CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md #22518
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)
44-44: Consider using consistent link formattingWhile the FAQ link is correct, consider using the same reference-style link format as used for other links in the document for consistency.
-For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see https://contributor-covenant.org/faq +For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see [the FAQ][faq] + +[faq]: https://contributor-covenant.org/faq
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)
Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (2)
5-5: LGTM! Enhanced inclusivity in Our Pledge section
The addition of "education, socio-economic status" broadens the scope of inclusivity appropriately.
33-33: LGTM! Improved clarity in Scope section
The rephrasing enhances readability while maintaining the original intent.
* main: build(deps): Bump cosmossdk.io/math from 1.3.0 to 1.4.0 (#22580) fix(server/v2/api/telemetry): enable global metrics (#22571) refactor(server/v2/cometbft): add `codec.Codec` and clean-up APIs (#22566) feat(core/coretesting): make memDB satisfy db.Db interface (#22570) Merge commit from fork fix(server(/v2)): fix fallback genesis path (#22564) fix: only overwrite context chainID when necessary (#22568) docs(client): Update setFeeGranter and setFeePayer comments (#22526) fix(baseapp): populate header info in `NewUncachedContext` (#22557) build(deps): Bump buf.build/gen/go/cometbft/cometbft/protocolbuffers/go from 1.35.1-20240701160653-fedbb9acfd2f.1 to 1.35.2-20240701160653-fedbb9acfd2f.1 in /api (#22551) build(deps): Bump github.com/creachadair/atomicfile from 0.3.5 to 0.3.6 in /tools/confix (#22552) docs: Update reference of Approximation (#22550) fix(server/v2/comebft): wire missing services + fix simulation (#21964) ci: fix permissions for GITHUB_TOKEN on dependabot workflows (#22547) ci: fix permissions for GITHUB_TOKEN in spell check workflow (#22545) build(deps): Bump google.golang.org/protobuf from 1.35.1 to 1.35.2 (#22537) fix(cosmovisor): premature upgrade on restart (#22528) fix(store/v2/pebble): handle version 0 in keys (#22524) refactor(server/v2/telemetry): swap redirects (#22520) docs: Update content in CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (#22518)
Description
Update content and keep it consistent with the latest content of the Contributor Covenant
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit