Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(orm) :add test case for bytes.go #22878

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

jack-rone
Copy link

@jack-rone jack-rone commented Dec 16, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced a suite of unit tests for byte array encoding and decoding functionalities, covering various scenarios including comparison, buffer size computation, and handling of empty or large inputs.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a comprehensive test suite for BytesCodec and NonTerminalBytesCodec in the ormfield package. The new bytes_test.go file contains multiple test functions that validate encoding, decoding, comparison, and buffer size computation for byte arrays. The tests cover various scenarios, including standard encoding/decoding, comparison logic, buffer size calculations, and handling of edge cases like empty and large byte arrays.

Changes

File Change Summary
orm/encoding/ormfield/bytes_test.go Added comprehensive unit tests for BytesCodec and NonTerminalBytesCodec, including tests for encoding, decoding, comparison, and buffer size computation

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:Store

Suggested reviewers

  • kocubinski
  • cool-develope
  • testinginprod
  • tac0turtle

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the C:orm label Dec 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
orm/encoding/ormfield/bytes_test.go (2)

3-10: Reorder imports according to project conventions.

The imports should follow the project's standard ordering:

  1. Standard library
  2. Default external
  3. cosmossdk.io
  4. github.com/cosmos
import (
	"bytes"
	"testing"

-	"cosmossdk.io/orm/encoding/ormfield"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
	"google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
+	"cosmossdk.io/orm/encoding/ormfield"
)
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

7-7: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


9-9: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


21-60: Consider adding more test cases for BytesCodec.

While the current test coverage is good, consider adding these test cases for completeness:

  1. Empty byte arrays
  2. Large byte arrays (similar to TestNonTerminalBytesCodecHandlesLargeInput)
  3. Error scenarios

Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7372d9 and 9d38ad1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • orm/encoding/ormfield/bytes_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
orm/encoding/ormfield/bytes_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.


Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
orm/encoding/ormfield/bytes_test.go

7-7: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


9-9: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
orm/encoding/ormfield/bytes_test.go (2)

12-19: LGTM! Clean mock implementation.

The MockReader implementation is well-structured and appropriately scoped for the test requirements.


62-137: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for NonTerminalBytesCodec.

The test suite is well-structured with good coverage of:

  • Basic encoding/decoding
  • Buffer size computation
  • Comparison operations
  • Edge cases (empty arrays)
  • Stress testing (300-byte arrays)

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey! If you wish to add this test, please add it in codec_test.go, matching the style of the other tests.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title feat:add test case for bytes.go test(orm) :add test case for bytes.go Dec 16, 2024
*bytes.Reader
}

func NewMockReader(data []byte) *MockReader {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this new definition and type just to avoid typing bytes.NewReader? You simply could write
var newMockReader = bytes.NewReader

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, i will check it

assert.Equal(t, []byte("hello"), buffer.Bytes())

// Decode
decoded, err := codec.Decode(NewMockReader(buffer.Bytes()))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could hav passed in buffer directly.

@jack-rone jack-rone closed this Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants