Fix typos in various files

[Pronoss]

This PR fixes minor typographical errors in several files:

• Fixed minor typos in variable names and method descriptions.
• Corrected articles usage ("a" vs "an") in comments and documentation.

---

Author Checklist

• Included the correct type prefix in the PR title.
• Targeted the correct branch.
• Provided a link to the relevant issue.
• Reviewed "Files changed" and left comments where necessary.
• Added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md.
• Updated the relevant documentation.
• Confirmed all CI checks have passed.

Reviewers Checklist

• Confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title.
• Confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed.
• Reviewed the state machine logic, API design, and naming.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Corrected grammatical errors in comments across multiple files
  • Updated documentation for clarity without changing functionality
  • Improved language precision in various package and method descriptions

• Chores

  • Minor text refinements in README, RFC, and test files
  • Consistent grammatical improvements across documentation

The changes are purely grammatical and do not impact the software's functionality or behavior.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on minor grammatical corrections across various files in the Cosmos SDK repository. The changes primarily involve fixing grammatical errors in comments, such as replacing "a empty" with "an empty" and similar small linguistic improvements. These modifications do not alter any code functionality or logic, but instead improve the clarity and grammatical accuracy of the documentation and comments.

Changes

File	Change Summary
baseapp/test_helpers.go	Corrected comment grammar from "a empty header" to "an empty header"
client/v2/README.md	Updated output format flag description formatting
core/appmodule/doc.go	Fixed grammatical error from "an module" to "a module"
docs/rfc/rfc-004-accounts.md	Removed a line previously marked for deletion
x/auth/signing/sign_mode_handler.go	Corrected comment from "defines a interface" to "defines an interface"
x/staking/keeper/cons_pubkey.go	Changed comment from "if there is a entry" to "if there is an entry"
x/tx/signing/textual/protoreflect_list_test.go	Updated comment from "creates a empty list" to "creates an empty list"

Possibly related PRs

• chore: fix spelling errors #21610: Addresses spelling errors in comments
• chore: remove duplicate proto files for the same proto file #21648: Minor corrections in comments
• ci: remove duplicate gosec & lint fixes #21685: Fixing typos and improving comment clarity
• docs(x/accounts): fix doc #22295: Fixing documentation and comments
• test: x/accounts systemtests #22320: System tests with grammatical comment corrections
• docs: fixed typo in threshold and quorums section of onchain multi-sig guide in user guide section of sdk docs #22374: Correcting typographical errors in documentation
• docs: fix typos in documentation files #23063: Addressing typographical errors
• docs: Correct grammar errors across multiple files #23074: Correcting grammar errors in comments
• chore: fix typos #23075: Correcting typos in comments
• docs: fixed typos and improved clarity in documentation #23077: Corrections to comments and documentation
• docs: fix typos #23105: Addressing typographical errors in comments
• docs: Fix typo in x/slashing/README.md #23107: Correcting documentation typo
• docs: fix typos #23116: Fixing typos in comments
• chore: fix struct field name and some typos in comment #23126: Correcting comments and field names
• docs: fix typos #23152: Correcting terminology in documentation

Suggested Labels

C:x/auth, C:x/staking, C:Store

Suggested Reviewers

• kocubinski
• lucaslopezf
• facundomedica
• julienrbrt
• testinginprod
• sontrinh16
• tac0turtle
• akhilkumarpilli

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f2bab5 and dd01abd.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)

• baseapp/test_helpers.go (1 hunks)
• client/v2/README.md (1 hunks)
• core/appmodule/doc.go (1 hunks)
• docs/rfc/rfc-004-accounts.md (1 hunks)
• x/auth/signing/sign_mode_handler.go (1 hunks)
• x/staking/keeper/cons_pubkey.go (1 hunks)
• x/tx/signing/textual/protoreflect_list_test.go (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)

• core/appmodule/doc.go
• x/staking/keeper/cons_pubkey.go
• x/tx/signing/textual/protoreflect_list_test.go
• x/auth/signing/sign_mode_handler.go
• baseapp/test_helpers.go
• client/v2/README.md
• docs/rfc/rfc-004-accounts.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Summary

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[julienrbrt]

PRs fixing typos only aren't accepted according to our CONTRIBUTING.md