-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
R4R: Paramchange proposal skips omitempty fields #4403
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4403 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 57.21% 57.27% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 241 242 +1
Lines 15123 15149 +26
==========================================
+ Hits 8653 8677 +24
- Misses 5840 5841 +1
- Partials 630 631 +1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two minor points of feedback, but otherwise LGTM.
Co-Authored-By: Federico Kunze <31522760+fedekunze@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested ACK
I realized that simulated tally params are hard-coded and I also added governance param changes to simulation. One of those two things broke CI -- I'm looking into it. |
Looks like CI is fixed here! Are we good to merge? |
Closes: #4247
Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
Linked to github-issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
Wrote tests
Updated relevant documentation (
docs/
)Added a relevant changelog entry:
clog add [section] [stanza] [message]
rereviewed
Files changed
in the github PR explorerFor Admin Use: