Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix proof verify #5313
Fix proof verify #5313
Changes from 3 commits
4b61c3f
74318ca
5d4b1e3
28f840f
36c252a
4003c9f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there should add some complementary check, or panic? @fedekunze @AdityaSripal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you mean by complementary check?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On
BindPort
, the key.Name() is equal to the portID. So I think we should add this check, it is what the test case expects, refercosmos-sdk/x/ibc/05-port/keeper/keeper_test.go
Line 64 in 5d4b1e3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see a new test failing here:
the problem is that
p.KeyPath.String()
does not represent the real path. That's why I added theurl.PathUnescape
method.cc: @AdityaSripal
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tendermint/merkel
use the/
as separator to split the multiple keys,p.KeyPath.String()
convert the key can avoid the confusion.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the original method was correct. Keypath should be separated by
/
. Not sure what you mean here by multiple keysThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
Keypath
is an array of Key which I mentioned multiple keys.But the
Key.name
may contain/
, soKeyPath.String()
method escape theKey.name
.In this test case, there are two Keys with name
storePrefixKey
andpath1/path2/path3/key
. If we not escape theKey.name
, we can't distinguish theKey
andKey.name
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is failing actually failing here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah,
host.DefaultPathValidator
will check the pathisAlphaNumeric
, but it has the prefix[]byte{0x00}
. So I wonder if we can revert the prefix using submodule_name, such asconnection
,channel
, etc.