-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: remove legacy handler #9650
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b988a18
remove x/*/handler.go file
aleem1314 1f2e0f2
fix evidence keeper tests
aleem1314 9d28b59
fix gov abci tests
aleem1314 6dd2ba7
Merge branch 'master' into aleem/7517-legacy-handler
aleem1314 bfa4c53
fix x/staking tests
aleem1314 ae8ce20
remove x/crisis/handler.go
aleem1314 f9bacf6
Update CHANGELOG.md
aleem1314 be0fb9c
Merge branch 'master' into aleem/7517-legacy-handler
aleem1314 adab912
Merge branch 'master' into aleem/7517-legacy-handler
aleem1314 1be71c6
add deprecated panic message
aleem1314 0b05827
replace panic with route
aleem1314 f34c2c7
Merge branch 'master' into aleem/7517-legacy-handler
aleem1314 12a8fc8
Merge branch 'master' into aleem/7517-legacy-handler
aleem1314 c08db7e
fix import
aleem1314 77a2b1a
review changes
aleem1314 b2cb096
Merge branch 'master' into aleem/7517-legacy-handler
aleem1314 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we panic instead with a clear message "this method is deprecated and not implemented by the SDK anymore" ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah returning just
sdk.Route{}
seems like it could lead to errors possibly? I'd recommend doing anything we can to encourage developers to not use deprecated functionality and panicing seems OK to me.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding panic is breaking RegisterRoutes. We are not registering empty router, I think returning
sdk.Route{}
is fine.