Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(test)!: refactor simapp.Setup function #9938

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 17, 2021

Conversation

aleem1314
Copy link
Contributor

@aleem1314 aleem1314 commented Aug 15, 2021

Description

ref: #8961

Following up on #9697, this PR is the first step for the #8961.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@orijbot
Copy link

orijbot commented Aug 15, 2021

@aleem1314 aleem1314 changed the title refactor!(test): refactor simapp.Setup function refactor(test)!: refactor simapp.Setup function Aug 15, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 15, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #9938 (9845fae) into master (1dba673) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 20.00%.

❗ Current head 9845fae differs from pull request most recent head c20bc5b. Consider uploading reports for the commit c20bc5b to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9938   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.80%   63.80%           
=======================================
  Files         566      566           
  Lines       53358    53362    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        34043    34046    +3     
- Misses      17395    17397    +2     
+ Partials     1920     1919    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
simapp/test_helpers.go 0.69% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
x/upgrade/client/testutil/suite.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
crypto/keys/internal/ecdsa/privkey.go 82.45% <0.00%> (-1.76%) ⬇️
x/params/keeper/grpc_query.go 84.21% <0.00%> (+10.52%) ⬆️

@aleem1314 aleem1314 marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2021 04:37
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Amaury <1293565+amaurym@users.noreply.github.com>
aleem1314 and others added 3 commits August 16, 2021 20:09
@amaury1093 amaury1093 added the A:automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass. label Aug 16, 2021
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 23e864b into master Aug 17, 2021
@mergify mergify bot deleted the aleem/8961-test-refactor branch August 17, 2021 00:52
larry0x pushed a commit to larry0x/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
<!--
The default pull request template is for types feat, fix, or refactor.
For other templates, add one of the following parameters to the url:
- template=docs.md
- template=other.md
-->

## Description

ref: cosmos#8961 

<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->
Following up on [cosmos#9697](cosmos#9697 (review)), this PR is the first step for the cosmos#8961.

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [x] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants