Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chore: Make a state entry to find total amount of native assets IBC'd out #3019
Chore: Make a state entry to find total amount of native assets IBC'd out #3019
Changes from 22 commits
8290b79
1421e5a
93d8454
f0768e9
7c868c6
03023fc
2f5c571
ffa737f
468f00f
c6ba4c5
e4972f0
6201c08
c8f6087
f6b6079
7d44018
3948566
914cae0
df3f7e6
f77f7a8
f532101
daeacf8
bd3600f
5c676dd
b18c78e
01ff13d
b1ba2b7
15c5ef4
ea7e76c
72e871c
6071ad2
94357f8
ce36ec1
c9b304c
9569e8a
dfab5f8
f3213d8
fb426c1
659b10a
2abcfb1
6d68dc3
aa54c5f
9b25880
28627f9
920ae09
0ecabea
966df1f
3c2e47b
38a91ab
817c888
1574d3f
540e3ac
7310277
07d3266
b3fcf69
8057568
e3267e8
a0757c9
5ba4f59
4047be9
77655f2
9c036e4
aac5321
107f4d6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We use
q
in the rest of the file, and I believe that's the convention we are following for gRPC queries in general.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember there being a note to change these from
q
tok
, but I can't find the comment or issue. It isn't consistent in the code base, see ics27. My general preference would be to usek
as that makes logical sense to me, but I'm okay to open a separate issueThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
missing test case for multiple denoms in one balance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can update the comments to indicate why we are doing this as opposed to what the function means. Maybe something like:
I wonder if we should dump the attached issue into an ADR and then reference the ADR number. If there's an architectural change a few years from now that makes this extra storing unnecessary, it might help to have context of why we made this decision