Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ICS4: Add ORDERED_ALLOW_TIMEOUT channel type #636
ICS4: Add ORDERED_ALLOW_TIMEOUT channel type #636
Changes from all commits
a2101e1
0e7a5f3
70c3116
a504cb1
d0ca2d9
5d30f13
39f0a19
77af5b6
7866f13
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AdityaSripal Does this mean that if a packet x times out, any packet y that was sent after x cannot be received before the timeout period of x elapses?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct. Is it unclear?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As a side note about ICS4, shouldn't we call here the
OnRecvPacket()
callback function and in case it returns a non-nil ACK, invokewriteAcknowledgement
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In order for the following property to hold, we need to check for the sequence here, similar to the ORDERED case.
This means that a packet with sequence e.g., 5 cannot be timed out while we are still waiting for an ACK from sequence e.g., 3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed on line 898