Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update tendermint client to not prune light blocks #437

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2021

Conversation

colin-axner
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@colin-axner colin-axner merged commit 47b80d1 into master Feb 26, 2021
@colin-axner colin-axner deleted the colin/no-pruning branch February 26, 2021 16:06
colin-axner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2021
)

* bump sdk version to v0.41.3 (#430)

* bump sdk version

* bump SDK to v0.41.3

* inital work for refactoring state based relaying

* Modify relayPacketFromSequence

* update tendermint client to not prune light blocks (#437)

* Address comments and fix lint issues

* Fix lint issues

* Remove onRtyErr (lint issue)

* typo fix (#438)

* disable tm pruning (#441)

* update release naming (#442)

* Implement swagger docs and fix path validation (#434)

* Add swagger setup

* Add some routes docs and swagger ui

* Add few more route docs

* Add swagger docs for remaining routes

* Fix golint issues

* Fix unused lint issues

* check chain-id in AddChain

* add a light client database lock (#447)

Add a lock to prevent multiple processes from attempting to access the light client database at the same time. This typically resulted in unnecessary errors or even panics

* Close database connection even if second error triggers (#449)

Co-authored-by: Mark <mjackson@microtick.com>

* address comments

Co-authored-by: akhilkumarpilli <akhilkumar7947@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Afanti <fanjiahe2000@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Akhil Kumar P <36399231+akhilkumarpilli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark | Microtick <409166+mark-microtick@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark <mjackson@microtick.com>
colin-axner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2021
* refactor connection handshake update messages

* refactor channel update msg handling

* fix chain id for timeout

* fix build

* refactor state based relaying (fixes update client bug on retries) (#435)

* bump sdk version to v0.41.3 (#430)

* bump sdk version

* bump SDK to v0.41.3

* inital work for refactoring state based relaying

* Modify relayPacketFromSequence

* update tendermint client to not prune light blocks (#437)

* Address comments and fix lint issues

* Fix lint issues

* Remove onRtyErr (lint issue)

* typo fix (#438)

* disable tm pruning (#441)

* update release naming (#442)

* Implement swagger docs and fix path validation (#434)

* Add swagger setup

* Add some routes docs and swagger ui

* Add few more route docs

* Add swagger docs for remaining routes

* Fix golint issues

* Fix unused lint issues

* check chain-id in AddChain

* add a light client database lock (#447)

Add a lock to prevent multiple processes from attempting to access the light client database at the same time. This typically resulted in unnecessary errors or even panics

* Close database connection even if second error triggers (#449)

Co-authored-by: Mark <mjackson@microtick.com>

* address comments

Co-authored-by: akhilkumarpilli <akhilkumar7947@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Afanti <fanjiahe2000@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Akhil Kumar P <36399231+akhilkumarpilli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark | Microtick <409166+mark-microtick@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark <mjackson@microtick.com>

Co-authored-by: akhilkumarpilli <akhilkumar7947@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Afanti <fanjiahe2000@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Akhil Kumar P <36399231+akhilkumarpilli@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark | Microtick <409166+mark-microtick@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark <mjackson@microtick.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants