-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CRL validation improvements #482
Merged
iamnotacake
merged 6 commits into
cossacklabs:master
from
iamnotacake:anatolii/T1830-crl-caching-improvements
Jan 21, 2022
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e6204a3
Improve CRL validator performance [skip ci]
iamnotacake af65bd4
Improve CRL validator performance [skip ci]
iamnotacake 99505cb
Solve testing issues
iamnotacake f348f8b
Update CHANGELOG_DEV, avoid one struct copy in code
iamnotacake 8a4c54c
Updates after review
iamnotacake 741aeb2
Merge branch 'master' into anatolii/T1830-crl-caching-improvements
iamnotacake File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hm, why we store it as value and make several copy operations if
v.Client.Fetch(url, allowLocal)
returns pointer? can we store just pointer and avoid extra copies?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
plus, what about to encapsulate all this fields and use CRLCacheItem as interface, and initialize it with constructor?
because previously we initialized with
cacheItem := &CRLCacheItem{Fetched: time.Now(), CRL: *crl}
now we prepare map for it, set nil for a field of CRL result and only after that create struct value with:
But it's not
DefaultCRLVerifier
responsibility to know how CacheItem works. It should initialize it with CRL result andCacheItem
prepare itself and his map as it wants. And just provide simple API how to create item and how to get info about revoked cert:CacheItem.Get(cert *x509.Certificate)(revokedCert, ok)
And it is encapsulates that it uses SerialNumber of certificate for map, not some hash or any other cert fields.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's do it in next CRL-related PR? Gonna mention your comment in the task.