Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add benchmarks for coverlet.core #1680

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Bertk
Copy link
Collaborator

@Bertk Bertk commented Aug 5, 2024

Prepare benchmark tests for coverlet.core (currently uses InProcessToolchain)
=> could be used to monitor performance regressions

  • add benchmarks tests
  • fix build warnings
  • partial update of nuget packages

Results for master branch (small updates for dotnet.benchmark)
image

@Bertk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Bertk commented Aug 5, 2024

Results for coverlet 6.0.1 release (small updates for dotnet.benchmark)

image

@Bertk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Bertk commented Aug 5, 2024

@daveMueller @MarcoRossignoli Please send me your feedback whether this should added.

I use coverlet.core.benchmark.tests to identify the commit introducing the coverlet 6.0.2 performance regression (see PR #1689).

@Bertk Bertk force-pushed the dotnet-benchmark branch from f805c95 to 13d03a4 Compare August 15, 2024 06:11
@Bertk Bertk marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2024 06:17
@Bertk Bertk changed the title add benchmarks for coverlet.core and coverlet.msbuild add benchmarks for coverlet.core Sep 8, 2024
@Bertk Bertk assigned Bertk and unassigned MarcoRossignoli and daveMueller Sep 10, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@MarcoRossignoli MarcoRossignoli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine to me under test @daveMueller?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants