Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include timestamp #581

Closed

Conversation

daveMueller
Copy link
Collaborator

closes #378

@daveMueller daveMueller changed the title Include time stamp Include timestamp Oct 7, 2019
@daveMueller
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Default format:
image

Specified format:
image

@MarcoRossignoli MarcoRossignoli added the feature-request New feature request label Oct 7, 2019
@MarcoRossignoli
Copy link
Collaborator

MarcoRossignoli commented Oct 7, 2019

@daveMueller I think that we should support same switch for msbuild driver(dotnet test) and maybe if possible also for collectors(but here I don't if it's possible change the name).
BTW I'll flag that issue as Discussion because I don't know what @tonerdo @petli think about.

For now stop to work on this. Please every time you pick-up something ask on issue if it's a good candidate so I can confirm there if we need further discussion or it's ok work on it.
It's MY FAULT it was marked as up-for-grubs but the discussion wasn't finished yet, sorry 🙏 🙏 🙏 and thank's a lot for your great effort on Coverlet!

@MarcoRossignoli MarcoRossignoli added the discussion Generic discussion on something label Oct 7, 2019
@MarcoRossignoli
Copy link
Collaborator

MarcoRossignoli commented Oct 7, 2019

Ah @daveMueller feel free to pick up also non up-for-grabs issue if you want...pick up whatever you prefer...if it's not marked or is under discussion "ask" if you can pick up and we'll tell you if it makes sense or not!

@daveMueller
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@daveMueller I think that we should support same switch for msbuild driver(dotnet test) and maybe if possible also for collectors(but here I don't if it's possible change the name).
BTW I'll flag that issue as Discussion because I don't know what @tonerdo @petli think about.

@MarcoRossignoli Ok I already thought so but wasn't sure so I only pushed a solution for the console drivers. Just hit me up when the discussion on the issue is finished 👍.

@MarcoRossignoli
Copy link
Collaborator

Close for the moment, we want to move users to collectors so for now we can pause this feat.
We'll reopen if needed
Thank's for your effort here Dave!

@1bberto
Copy link

1bberto commented Aug 14, 2020

@MarcoRossignoli I do need this feature mate! 😨
is there a roadmap to publish it?
I would like to use it on my projects ❤️ 🚀

@MarcoRossignoli
Copy link
Collaborator

We need to undestand if this feat makes sense...at the moment we don't have a lot of 👍(interest) on issue feat and PR, also coverlet is supported on collectors(https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet#vstest-integration-preferred-due-to-known-issue-supports-only-net-core-application) and we need to investigate if it's possible define a custom file name as output(at the moment we send a default name coverage.* to vstest plat).

We're trying to keep features aligned as possible through drivers(.net tool, collectors,msbuild).

For now add your +1 here #378 usually we order the new features using thumbs up to scheduler new features.

@daveMueller daveMueller deleted the 378_IncludeTimeStamp branch October 27, 2023 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Generic discussion on something feature-request New feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Coverage output file name
3 participants