Skip to content

[dcl.fct] Clarify which declarations we're talking about in example. #4287

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2021
Merged

[dcl.fct] Clarify which declarations we're talking about in example. #4287

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 2 additions & 4 deletions source/declarations.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3755,16 +3755,14 @@
void g3(C3 auto...);
void g4(C3 auto);
\end{codeblock}

These declarations are functionally equivalent (but not equivalent) to
the following declarations.
The declarations above are functionally equivalent (but not equivalent) to
their respective declarations below:
\begin{codeblock}
template<C1 T, C2 U> void g1(const T*, U&);
template<C1... Ts> void g2(Ts&...);
template<C3... Ts> void g3(Ts...);
template<C3 T> void g4(T);
\end{codeblock}

Abbreviated function templates can be specialized like all function templates.
\begin{codeblock}
template<> void g1<int>(const int*, const double&); // OK, specialization of \tcode{g1<int, const double>}
Expand Down