-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: electron links open in browser #1223
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@cpvalente has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files. A new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/client/src/common/components/navigation-menu/NavigationMenu.module.scss (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/common/components/navigation-menu/NavigationMenu.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/client/src/viewerConfig.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
apps/client/src/viewerConfig.ts (1)
Line range hint
13-16
: LGTM: Unmodified time format constantsThe time format constants
FORMAT_12
andFORMAT_24
remain unchanged. They appear to be correctly defined for 12-hour and 24-hour clock formats respectively.apps/client/src/common/components/navigation-menu/NavigationMenu.module.scss (1)
50-50
: Approved, but clarification needed on PR objectives alignment.The addition of
width: 100%;
to the.link
class is a good improvement for usability. It ensures the entire area of the navigation menu item is clickable, which is particularly beneficial for touch interfaces.However, this change doesn't seem to directly relate to the stated PR objective of modifying how links open in an Electron environment. Could you please clarify how this CSS change contributes to the overall goal of the PR?
To better understand the context, let's check for any related changes:
apps/client/src/common/components/navigation-menu/NavigationMenu.tsx (1)
141-141
: Verify thatuseElectronEvent
returns an object withisElectron
In the line
const { isElectron } = useElectronEvent();
, ensure that theuseElectronEvent
hook returns an object containing theisElectron
property. If it returns a different structure, this could lead toundefined
errors.Run the following script to check the export of
useElectronEvent
:
87ed120
to
59352bf
Compare
59352bf
to
d7425db
Compare
As discussed, this change makes that the navigation menu links will open in a browser window if the user is in electron